The Unregulated Probiotic Market
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This narrative review provides an overview of the current regulation of probiotics, with a focus on those used for the dietary management of medical conditions (Medical Foods). FINDINGS: The probiotic market has grown rapidly, both for foods and supplements intended to enhance wellness in healthy individuals, and for preparations for the dietary management of disease. Regulation of probiotics varies between regions. Unless they make specific disease-related health claims, probiotics are regulated as food supplements and regulation is focused on the legitimacy of any claims, rather than efficacy, safety and quality. Many properties of probiotics are strain-specific, and safety and efficacy findings associated to specific formulations should not be generalized to other probiotic products. Manufacturing processes, conditions and ingredients are important determinants of product characteristics and changes to manufacturing are likely to give rise to a product not identical to the "original" in efficacy and safety if proper measures and controls are not taken. Current trademark law and the lack of stringent regulation of probiotic manufacturing mean that the trademark owner can commercialize any formulation under the same brand, even if significantly different from the original. These regulatory deficits may have serious consequences for patients where probiotics are used as part of clinical guideline-recommended management of serious conditions such as inflammatory bowel diseases, and may make doctors liable for prescribing a formulation not previously tested for safety and efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Current regulation of probiotics is inadequate to protect consumers and doctors, especially when probiotics are aimed at the dietary management of serious conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Globally, regulatory inconsistency prevails.
“Globally, regulatory inconsistency prevails.38”
From Safety and efficacy concerns in Indian probiotics: Insights from whole-genome sequencing and <i>in vitro</i> assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Well-studied probiotic species include Bifidobacterium (ssp. adolescentis, animalis, bifidum, breve, and longum) and Lactobacillus (ssp. acidophilus, casei, fermentum, gasseri, johnsonii, reuteri, paracasei, plantarum, rhamnosus, and salivarius).
“well-studied probiotic species include Bifidobacterium (ssp. adolescentis, animalis, bifidum, breve, and longum) and Lactobacillus (ssp. acidophilus, casei, fermentum, gasseri, johnsonii, reuteri, paracasei, plantarum, rhamnosus, and salivarius) [211].”
From International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics (2019) · cites this paper as [211]
Probiotics have been studied in vulnerable groups including infants, patients with severe acute pancreatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, liver diseases, HIV, and other conditions, with greater cause for concern for products containing high concentrations up to 450-900 billion live bacteria per dose.
“Further, probiotics have been studied in vulnerable groups, including infants, patients with severe acute pancreatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases, liver diseases, HIV, and other conditions [213, 216–218] with even greater cause for concern with the small number of products that contain high concentrations of up to 450–900 billion live bacteria per dose [211].”
From International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics (2019) · cites this paper as [211]
All common probiotic species are considered safe for the general population by EFSA.
“All common probiotic species are considered safe for the general population by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), although this definition does not provide guidance on the increasing use of probiotics in people with medical conditions.”
From International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics (2019) · cites this paper as [211]
The benefits of probiotics are not validated by EFSA, jeopardizing the use of the term probiotic without an approved claim, with some exceptions such as Italy, Czech Republic, and Bulgaria.
“Moreover the benefits of probiotics are not validated by EFSA, jeopardizing the use of the term probiotic without an approved claim with some exceptions such as in Italy, Czech Republic, and Bulgaria [211].”
From International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics (2019) · cites this paper as [211]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hill (2014) · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 · Cited by 9,592 · see citing works
Magro, F., Gionchetti, P., Eliakim, R., Ardizzone, S., Armuzzi, A., Barreiro-de Acosta, M., Burisch, J., Gecse, K. B., Hart, A. L., Hindryckx, P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx008 · Cited by 1,910 · see citing works
Dignass, A., Lindsay, J. O., Sturm, A., Windsor, A., Colombel, J.-F., Allez, M., D'Haens, G., D'Hoore, A., Mantzaris, G., Novacek, G., et al. (2012) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2012.09.002 · Cited by 1,548 · see citing works
Besselink, M. G., van Santvoort, H. C., Buskens, E., Boermeester, M. A., van Goor, H., Timmerman, H. M., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B., Bollen, T. L., van Ramshorst, B., Witteman, B. J., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60207-x · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
Harbord, M., Eliakim, R., Bettenworth, D., Karmiris, K., Katsanos, K., Kopylov, U., Kucharzik, T., Molnár, T., Raine, T., Sebastian, S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx009 · Cited by 1,180 · see citing works
Safety assessment of probiotics for human use
Sanders, M. E., Akkermans, L. M. A., Haller, D., Hammerman, C., Heimbach, J. T., Hörmannsperger, G., & Huys, G. (2010) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.1.3.12127 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Impact of consuming a milk drink containing a probiotic on mood and cognition
Benton, D., Williams, C., & Brown, A. (2007) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602546 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H., Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Álvarez‐Ordóñez, A., Bolton, D., Bover‐Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., Cesare, A. D., Hilbert, F., et al. (2021) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6377 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines: Probiotics and Prebiotics October 2011
Guarner, F., Khan, A. G., Garisch, J., Eliakim, R., Gangl, A., Thomson, A., Krabshuis, J., Lemair, T., Kaufmann, P., de Paula, J. A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0b013e3182549092 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
A systematic review of the safety of probiotics
Didari, T., Solki, S., Mozaffari, S., Nikfar, S., & Abdollahi, M. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1517/14740338.2014.872627 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Kolaček, S., Hojsak, I., Berni Canani, R., Guarino, A., Indrio, F., Orel, R., Pot, B., Shamir, R., Szajewska, H., Vandenplas, Y., et al. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001603 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Probiotic use in at-risk populations
Sanders, M. E., Merenstein, D. J., Ouwehand, A. C., Reid, G., Salminen, S., Cabana, M. D., Paraskevakos, G., & Leyer, G. (2016) · Journal of the American Pharmacists Association · doi:10.1016/j.japh.2016.07.001 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
d'Ettorre, G., Rossi, G., Scagnolari, C., Andreotti, M., Giustini, N., Serafino, S., Schietroma, I., Scheri, G. C., Fard, S. N., Trinchieri, V., et al. (2017) · Immunity, Inflammation and Disease · doi:10.1002/iid3.160 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Comparability and biosimilarity: considerations for the healthcare provider
Lee, J. F., Litten, J. B., & Grampp, G. E. (2012) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2012.686902 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H. (2015) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4138 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Biagioli, M., Laghi, L., Carino, A., Cipriani, S., Distrutti, E., Marchianò, S., Parolin, C., Scarpelli, P. T., Vitali, B., & Fiorucci, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00505 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Atıcı, S., Soysal, A., Cerit, K. K., Yılmaz, Ş., Aksu, B., Kıyan, G., & Bakır, M. (2017) · Medical Mycology Case Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mmcr.2017.02.002 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Efficacy and Safety of a Multistrain Probiotic Formulation Depends from Manufacturing
Trinchieri, V., Laghi, L., Vitali, B., Parolin, C., Giusti, I., Capobianco, D., Mastromarino, P., & Simone, C. D. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01474 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Martin, I. W., Tonner, R. H., Trivedi, J. B., Miller, H., Lee, R., Liang, X., Rotello, L. C., Isenbergh, E., Anderson, J., Perl, T. M., et al. (2016) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.12.004 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Gutiérrez, A., Zapater, P., Juanola, O., Sempere, L., García, M. F., Laveda, R., Martínez, A., Scharl, M. M., González-Navajas, J. M., Such, J. M., et al. (2016) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.8 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cinque, B., Torre, C. L., Lombardi, F., Palumbo, P., der Rest, M. V., & Cifone, M. G. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163216 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Advancing probiotic research in humans in the United States: Challenges and strategies
Sanders, M. E., Shane, A. L., & Merenstein, D. J. (2016) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2016.1138198 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
VSL#3 probiotic differently influences IEC‐6 intestinal epithelial cell status and function
Cinque, B., Torre, C. L., Lombardi, F., Palumbo, P., Evtoski, Z., Santini, S. J., Falone, S., Cimini, A., Amicarelli, F., & Cifone, M. G. (2017) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.25814 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Do probiotic preparations for humans really have efficacy?
Mikelsaar, M., Lazăr, V., Onderdonk, A. B., & Donelli, G. (2011) · Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease · doi:10.3402/mehd.v22i0.10128 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, et al. Expert consensus document: the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 11:506-514.
- Guidance for Industry: Frequently Asked Questions About Medical Foods. Second Edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2016.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of Probiotics in Human Gut Microbiome-Associated Diseases
Kim, S.-K., Guevarra, R. B., Kim, Y.-T., Kwon, J., Kim, H., Cho, J. H., Kim, H. B., & Lee, J.-H. (2019) · Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.4014/jmb.1906.06064 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Su, G. L., Ko, C. W., Bercik, P., Falck-Ytter, Y., Sultan, S., Weizman, A. V., & Morgan, R. L. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.059 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Modulating the microbiome to improve therapeutic response in cancer
McQuade, J. L., Daniel, C. R., Helmink, B. A., & Wargo, J. A. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30952-5 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Paraprobiotics and postbiotics: Concepts and potential applications in dairy products
Barros, C. P., Guimarães, J. T., Esmerino, E. A., Duarte, M. C. K., Silva, M. C., Silva, R., Ferreira, B. M., Sant’Ana, A. S., Freitas, M. Q., & Cruz, A. G. (2020) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2019.12.003 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics
Jäger, R., Mohr, A. E., Carpenter, K. C., Kerksick, C. M., Purpura, M., Moussa, A., Townsend, J. R., Lamprecht, M., West, N. P., Black, K., et al. (2019) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s12970-019-0329-0 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile: mechanisms and pharmacology
Khoruts, A., Staley, C., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0350-4 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Nyanzi, R., Jooste, P. J., & Buys, E. M. (2021) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-19116 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Álvarez-Arraño, V., & Martín-Peláez, S. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13103627 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
da Silva, T. F., Glória, R. D. A., Americo, M. F., Freitas, A. D. S., de Jesus, L. C. L., Barroso, F. A. L., Laguna, J. G., Coelho-Rocha, N. D., Tavares, L. M., le Loir, Y., et al. (2024) · Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins · doi:10.1007/s12602-024-10247-x · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Castro-López, C., García, H. S., Guadalupe Martínez-Ávila, G. C., González-Córdova, A. F., Vallejo-Cordoba, B., & Hernández-Mendoza, A. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.017 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Garg, V., Velumani, D., Lin, Y.-C., & Haye, A. (2024) · PharmaNutrition · doi:10.1016/j.phanu.2024.100423 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Lactobacilli Infection Case Reports in the Last Three Years and Safety Implications
Rossi, F., Amadoro, C., & Colavita, G. (2022) · doi:10.20944/preprints202202.0248.v1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Microbiological quality of probiotic products
Zavišić, G., Ristić, S., Petković, B., Živkov-Šaponja, D., Jojić, N., & Janković, D. (2023) · Arhiv za farmaciju · doi:10.5937/arhfarm73-42160 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Madhumathi, I., Ramesh, V., Rathakrishnan, B., Abirami, B., Gunasekaran, K., Kumar, T. S., Jeyasankar, P., Raja, G., Selvam, K., Rajendran, S., et al. (2026) · Gut microbes reports · doi:10.1080/29933935.2026.2668863
“38 The European Union lacks dedicated probiotic legislation, though health claims are regulated.”
- Authors
- de Simone, C.
- Venue
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 809-817
- ISSN
- 1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787854015
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 26.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Università degli Studi dell'Aquila
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Keywords
- probiotics, probiotic regulation, medical foods, dietary supplements, health claims, trademark law, inflammatory bowel disease, consumer protection, physician liability
- MeSH terms
- Diet Therapy, Drug and Narcotic Control, Health Policy, Humans, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review