Cited by 202Medication Adherence and ComplianceMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

The role of mHealth for improving medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review

Open access
Gandapur, Yousuf, Kianoush, Sina, Kelli, Heval M., Misra, Satish, Urrea, Bruno, Blaha, Michael J., Graham, Garth, Marvel, Francoise A. +1 more·2016·European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and a key barrier to improved outcomes is medication non-adherence. The aim of this study is to review the role of mobile health (mHealth) tools for improving medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease. We performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials that primarily investigated mHealth tools for improving adherence to cardiovascular disease medications in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, and stroke. We extracted and reviewed data on the types of mHealth tools used, preferences of patients and healthcare providers, the effect of the mHealth interventions on medication adherence, and the limitations of trials. We identified 10 completed trials matching our selection criteria, mostly with <100 participants, and ranging in duration from 1 to 18 months. mHealth tools included text messages, Bluetooth-enabled electronic pill boxes, online messaging platforms, and interactive voice calls. Patients and healthcare providers generally preferred mHealth to other interventions. All 10 studies reported that mHealth interventions improved medication adherence, though the magnitude of benefit was not consistently large and in one study was not greater than a telehealth comparator. Limitations of trials included small sample sizes, short duration of follow-up, self-reported outcomes, and insufficient assessment of unintended harms and financial implications. Current evidence suggests that mHealth tools can improve medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, high-quality clinical trials of sufficient size and duration are needed to move the field forward and justify use in routine care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw018

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McGillicuddy JW, Gregoski MJ, Weiland AK, Rock RA, Brunner-Jackson BM, Patel SK, Thomas BS, Taber DJ, Chavin KD, Baliga PK, Treiber FA. Mobile health medication adherence and blood pressure control in renal transplant recipients: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2013;2:e32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gandapur, Y., Kianoush, S., Kelli, H. M., Misra, S., Urrea, B., Blaha, M. J., Graham, G., Marvel, F. A., & Martin, S. S.
Affiliations
  • MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Gandapur, Yousuf
Venue
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Published
2016-04-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
237-244
ISSN
  • 2058-1742 (ISSN-L)
  • 2058-5225
OpenAlex
W2342277966
Cited by
202
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
mobile health, medication adherence, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, stroke, text messaging, telemedicine, patient preferences, healthcare provider preferences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Drug Monitoring, Reminder Systems, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine, Stroke, Cell Phone, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review