CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dnmt3a binds deacetylases and is recruited by a sequence‐specific repressor to silence transcription

Fuks, François, Burgers, Wendy A., Godin, Nadia, Kasai, Masataka, Kouzarides, Tony·2001·The EMBO Journal
DOI 10.1093/emboj/20.10.2536
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/20.10.2536

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Aapola U et al. (2000) Isolation and initial characterization of a novel zinc finger gene, DNMT3L, on 21q22.3, related to the cytosine‐5‐methyltransferase 3 gene family. Genomics, 65, 293–298. · DOI
  2. Aasland R, Gibson TJ and Stewart AF (1995) The PHD finger: implications for chromatin‐mediated transcriptional regulation. Trends Biochem Sci, 20, 56–59. · DOI
  3. Aoki K, Meng G, Suzuki K, Takashi T, Kameoka Y, Nakahara K, Ishida R and Kasai M (1998) RP58 associates with condensed chromatin and mediates a sequence‐ specific transcriptional repression. J Biol Chem, 273, 26698–26704. · DOI
  4. Bannister AJ and Kouzarides T (1995) CBP‐induced stimulation of c‐Fos activity is abrogated by E1A. EMBO J, 14, 4758–4762. · DOI
  5. Bannister AJ and Kouzarides T (1996) The CBP co‐activator is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature, 384, 641–643. · DOI
  6. Bardwell VJ and Treisman R (1994) The POZ domain: a conserved protein–protein interaction motif. Genes Dev, 8, 1664–1677. · DOI
  7. Bestor TH (2000) The DNA methyltransferases of mammals. Hum Mol Genet, 9, 2395–2402. · DOI
  8. Bestor T, Laudano A, Mattaliano R and Ingram V (1988) Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding DNA methyltransferase of mouse cells. The carboxyl‐terminal domain of the mammalian enzymes is related to bacterial restriction methyltransferases. J Mol Biol, 203, 971–983. · DOI
  9. Brehm A, Miska EA, McCance DJ, Reid JL, Bannister AJ and Kouzarides T (1998) Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature, 391, 597–601. · DOI
  10. Brehm A, Nielsen SJ, Miska EA, McCance DJ, Reid JL, Bannister AJ and Kouzarides T (1999) The E7 oncoprotein associates with Mi2 and histone deacetylase activity to promote cell growth. EMBO J, 18, 2449–2458. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cross SH, Meehan RR, Nan X and Bird A (1997) A component of the transcriptional repressor MeCP1 shares a motif with DNA methyltransferase and HRX proteins. Nature Genet, 16, 256–259. · DOI
  12. Fuks F, Burgers WA, Brehm A, Hughes‐Davies L and Kouzarides T (2000) DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 associates with histone deacetylase activity. Nature Genet, 24, 88–91. · DOI
  13. Gibbons RJ et al. (1997) Mutations in transcriptional regulator ATRX establish the functional significance of a PHD‐like domain. Nature Genet, 17, 146–148. · DOI
  14. Hagemeier C, Cook A and Kouzarides T (1993) The retinoblastoma protein binds E2F residues required for activation in vivo and TBP binding in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res, 21, 4998–5004. · DOI
  15. Hsieh CL (1999) In vivo activity of murine de novo methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Mol Cell Biol, 19, 8211–8218. · DOI
  16. Jaenisch R (1997) DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother? Trends Genet, 13, 323–329. · DOI
  17. Jones PL, Veenstra GJ, Wade PA, Vermaak D, Kass SU, Landsberger N, Strouboulis J and Wolffe AP (1998) Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature Genet, 19, 187–191. · DOI
  18. Kafri T, Ariel M, Brandeis M, Shemer R, Urven L, McCarrey J, Cedar H and Razin A (1992) Developmental pattern of gene‐specific DNA methylation in the mouse embryo and germ line. Genes Dev, 6, 705–714. · DOI
  19. Kouzarides T (1999) Histone acetylases and deacetylases in cell proliferation. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 9, 40–48. · DOI
  20. Lauster R, Trautner TA and Noyer‐Weidner M (1989) Cytosine‐specific type II DNA methyltransferases. A conserved enzyme core with variable target‐recognizing domains. J Mol Biol, 206, 305–312. · DOI
  21. Lavender P, Vandel L, Bannister AJ and Kouzarides T (1997) The HMG‐box transcription factor HBP1 is targeted by the pocket proteins and E1A. Oncogene, 14, 2721–2728. · DOI
  22. Leonhardt H, Page AW, Weier HU and Bestor TH (1992) A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei. Cell, 71, 865–873. · DOI
  23. Liu Y, Oakeley EJ, Sun L and Jost JP (1998) Multiple domains are involved in the targeting of the mouse DNA methyltransferase to the DNA replication foci. Nucleic Acids Res, 26, 1038–1045. · DOI
  24. Lyko F, Ramsahoye BH, Kashevsky H, Tudor M, Mastrangelo MA, Orr‐Weaver TL and Jaenisch R (1999) Mammalian (cytosine‐5) methyltransferases cause genomic DNA methylation and lethality in Drosophila. Nature Genet, 23, 363–366. · DOI
  25. Ma Q et al. (1993) Analysis of the murine All‐1 gene reveals conserved domains with human ALL‐1 and identifies a motif shared with DNA methyltransferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 90, 6350–6354. · DOI
  26. Martinez‐Balbas MA, Bauer UM, Nielsen SJ, Brehm A and Kouzarides T (2000) Regulation of E2F1 activity by acetylation. EMBO J, 19, 662–671. · DOI
  27. Monk M, Boubelik M and Lehnert S (1987) Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development. Development, 99, 371–382. · DOI
  28. Morkel M, Wenkel J, Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T and Hagemeier C (1997) An E2F‐like repressor of transcription. Nature, 390, 567–568. · DOI
  29. Nan X, Ng HH, Johnson CA, Laherty CD, Turner BM, Eisenman RN and Bird A (1998) Transcriptional repression by the methyl‐CpG‐binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature, 393, 386–389. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ng HH, Zhang Y, Hendrich B, Johnson CA, Turner BM, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D and Bird A (1999) MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex. Nature Genet, 23, 58–61. · DOI
  31. Ng HH, Jeppesen P and Bird A (2000) Active repression of methylated genes by the chromosomal protein MBD1. Mol Cell Biol, 20, 1394–1406. · DOI
  32. Okano M, Xie S and Li E (1998) Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine‐5) methyltransferases. Nature Genet, 19, 219–220. · DOI
  33. Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA and Li E (1999) DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell, 99, 247–257. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Ramchandani S, MacLeod AR, Pinard M, von Hofe E and Szyf M (1997) Inhibition of tumorigenesis by a cytosine‐DNA, methyltransferase, antisense oligodeoxynucleotide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 94, 684–689. · DOI
  35. Razin A (1998) CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing—a three‐way connection. EMBO J, 17, 4905–4908. · DOI
  36. Robertson KD, Ait‐Si‐Ali S, Yokochi T, Wade PA, Jones PL and Wolffe AP (2000) DNMT1 forms a complex with Rb, E2F1 and HDAC1 and represses transcription from E2F‐responsive promoters. Nature Genet, 25, 338–342. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Rountree MR, Bachman KE and Baylin SB (2000) DNMT1 binds HDAC2 and a new co‐repressor, DMAP1, to form a complex at replication foci. Nature Genet, 25, 269–277. · DOI
  38. Sanford JP, Clark HJ, Chapman VM and Rossant J (1987) Differences in DNA methylation during oogenesis and spermatogenesis and their persistence during early embryogenesis in the mouse. Genes Dev, 1, 1039–1046. · DOI
  39. Surani MA (1998) Imprinting and the initiation of gene silencing in the germ line. Cell, 93, 309–312. · DOI
  40. Vertino PM, Yen RW, Gao J and Baylin SB (1996) De novo methylation of CpG island sequences in human fibroblasts overexpressing DNA (cytosine‐5)‐methyltransferase. Mol Cell Biol, 16, 4555–4565. · DOI
  41. Wade PA, Gegonne A, Jones PL, Ballestar E, Aubry F and Wolffe AP (1999) Mi‐2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation. Nature Genet, 23, 62–66. · DOI
  42. Xu GL et al. (1999) Chromosome instability and immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in a DNA methyltransferase gene. Nature, 402, 187–191. · DOI
  43. Yoder JA, Soman NS, Verdine GL and Bestor TH (1997) DNA (cytosine‐5)‐methyltransferases in mouse cells and tissues. Studies with a mechanism‐based probe. J Mol Biol, 270, 385–395. · DOI
  44. Yoshida M, Horinouchi S and Beppu T (1995) Trichostatin A and trapoxin: novel chemical probes for the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function. BioEssays, 17, 423–430. · DOI
  45. Zhang Y, LeRoy G, Seelig HP, Lane WS and Reinberg D (1998) The dermatomyositis‐specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell, 95, 279–289. · DOI
  46. Zhang Y, Ng HH, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Tempst P, Bird A and Reinberg D (1999) Analysis of the NuRD subunits reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA methylation. Genes Dev, 13, 1924–1935. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Fuks, F., Burgers, W. A., Godin, N., Kasai, M., & Kouzarides, T.
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-05-15
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
2536-2544
ISSN
  • 0261-4189
  • 1460-2075
DOI
10.1093/emboj/20.10.2536
Cited by
473
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review