Cited by 236Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerWilliams Syndrome Research

WSTF–ISWI chromatin remodeling complex targets heterochromatic replication foci

Open access
Bozhenok, Ludmila, Wade, Paul A., Varga‐Weisz, Patrick·2002·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

The Williams Syndrome Transcription Factor (WSTF), the product of the WBSCR9 gene, is invariably deleted in the haploinsufficiency Williams-Beuren Syndrome. Along with the nucleosome-dependent ATPase ISWI, WSTF forms a novel chromatin remodeling complex, WICH (WSTF-ISWI chromatin remodeling complex), which is conserved in vertebrates. The WICH complex was purified to homogeneity from Xenopus egg extract and was found to contain only WSTF and ISWI. In mouse cells, WSTF interacts with the SNF2H isoform of ISWI. WSTF accumulates in pericentric heterochromatin coincident with the replication of these structures, suggesting a role for WSTF in the replication of heterochromatin. Such a role is supported by the in vitro activity of both the mouse and frog WICH complexes: they are involved in the assembly of regular spaced nucleosomal arrays. In contrast to the related ISWI-interacting protein ACF1/WCRF180, WSTF binds stably to mitotic chromosomes. As dysfunction of other chromatin remodeling factors often has severe effects on development, haploinsufficiency of WSTF may explain some of the phenotypes associated with this disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/21.9.2231

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bozhenok, L., Wade, P. A., & Varga‐Weisz, P.
Affiliations
  • Marie Curie (GB)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Varga‐Weisz, Patrick
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
2231-2241
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2153612581
Cited by
236
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2002-06-17)
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Marie Curie
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
WSTF, ISWI, chromatin remodeling, pericentromeric heterochromatin, Williams syndrome, SNF2H, nucleosome assembly, metaphase chromosomes, haploinsufficiency
MeSH terms
Bromodomain Containing Proteins, Adenosine Triphosphatases, Animals, Female, HeLa Cells, Heterochromatin, Humans, Nucleosomes, Oocytes, Stem Cells, Transcription Factors, Xenopus, Gene Deletion, Replication Origin, Williams Syndrome, Macromolecular Substances, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review