Cited by 268Chromatin Remodeling and CancerWilliams Syndrome ResearchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

RETRACTED: The Chromatin-Remodeling Complex WINAC Targets a Nuclear Receptor to Promoters and Is Impaired in Williams Syndrome

Open access
Kitagawa, Hirochika, Fujiki, Ryoji, Yoshimura, Kimihiro, Mezaki, Yoshihiro, Uematsu, Yoshikatsu, Matsui, Daisuke, Ogawa, Satoko, Unno, Kiyoe +9 more·2003·Cell

Abstract

We identified a human multiprotein complex (WINAC) that directly interacts with the vitamin D receptor (VDR) through the Williams syndrome transcription factor (WSTF). WINAC has ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling activity and contains both SWI/SNF components and DNA replication-related factors. The latter might explain a WINAC requirement for normal S phase progression. WINAC mediates the recruitment of unliganded VDR to VDR target sites in promoters, while subsequent binding of coregulators requires ligand binding. This recruitment order exemplifies that an interaction of a sequence-specific regulator with a chromatin-remodeling complex can organize nucleosomal arrays at specific local sites in order to make promoters accessible for coregulators. Furthermore, overexpression of WSTF could restore the impaired recruitment of VDR to vitamin D regulated promoters in fibroblasts from Williams syndrome patients. This suggests that WINAC dysfunction contributes to Williams syndrome, which could therefore be considered, at least in part, a chromatin-remodeling factor disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00436-7This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitagawa, H., Fujiki, R., Yoshimura, K., Mezaki, Y., Uematsu, Y., Matsui, D., Ogawa, S., Unno, K., Okubo, M., Tokita, A., Nakagawa, T., Ito, T., Ishimi, Y., Nagasawa, H., Matsumoto, T., Yanagisawa, J., & Kato, S.
Affiliations
Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
113
Issue
7
Pages
905-917
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150721910
Cited by
268
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
chromatin remodeling complexes, Williams syndrome, vitamin D receptor, SWI/SNF complex, promoter accessibility, coregulators, nucleosome organization, S phase progression
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Nucleus, Chromatin, DNA Replication, Eukaryotic Cells, Fetus, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Regulator, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Nucleosomes, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation, S Phase, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Receptors, Calcitriol, Williams Syndrome, Active Transport, Cell Nucleus, Macromolecular Substances, Multiprotein Complexes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review