Cited by 284Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

A phosphoserine/threonine-binding pocket in AGC kinases and PDK1 mediates activation by hydrophobic motif phosphorylation

Open access
Frödin, Morten, Antal, Torben L., Dümmler, Bettina A., Jensen, Claus J., Deak, Maria, Gammeltoft, Steen, Biondi, Ricardo M.·2002·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

The growth factor-activated AGC protein kinases RSK, S6K, PKB, MSK and SGK are activated by serine/threonine phosphorylation in the activation loop and in the hydrophobic motif, C-terminal to the kinase domain. In some of these kinases, phosphorylation of the hydrophobic motif creates a specific docking site that recruits and activates PDK1, which then phosphorylates the activation loop. Here, we discover a pocket in the kinase domain of PDK1 that recognizes the phosphoserine/phosphothreonine in the hydrophobic motif by identifying two oppositely positioned arginine and lysine residues that bind the phosphate. Moreover, we demonstrate that RSK2, S6K1, PKBalpha, MSK1 and SGK1 contain a similar phosphate-binding pocket, which they use for intramolecular interaction with their own phosphorylated hydrophobic motif. Molecular modelling and experimental data provide evidence for a common activation mechanism in which the phosphorylated hydrophobic motif and activation loop act on the alphaC-helix of the kinase structure to induce synergistic stimulation of catalytic activity. Sequence conservation suggests that this mechanism is a key feature in activation of >40 human AGC kinases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/cdf551

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SGK1 possesses a kinase domain with a pocket that recognizes hydrophobic motifs containing phosphoserine/phosphothreonine, enabling distinct substrate affinity.

    “Similar to other AGC protein kinases, SGK1 possesses a kinase domain featuring a pocket that recognizes hydrophobic motifs containing phosphoserine/phosphothreonine. This pocket achieves recognition through phosphorylation of two oppositely positioned arginine and lysine residues. This structural characteristic enables SGK1’s distinct substrate affinity in biological processes”

    From Serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) in neurological disorders: pain or gain (2024) · cites this paper as Frodin et al., 2002

    The Abstract and Introduction state that SGK1 has a phosphate-binding pocket that interacts with its own phosphorylated hydrophobic motif and stimulates kinase activity. The Discussion says oppositely positioned arginine or lysine residues bind the motif’s phosphate; it does not say those residues are phosphorylated. These passages do not establish the claimed distinct substrate affinity. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frödin, M., Antal, T. L., Dümmler, B. A., Jensen, C. J., Deak, M., Gammeltoft, S., & Biondi, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Glostrup Hospital (DK)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Frödin, Morten
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2002-10-15
Volume
21
Issue
20
Pages
5396-5407
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2018380860
Cited by
275
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Kræftens Bekæmpelse
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
AGC protein kinases, PDK1, kinase activation mechanism, RSK2, S6K1, MSK1, SGK1, activation loop, αC-helix, intramolecular interactions, growth factor signaling
MeSH terms
Serum-Glucocorticoid Regulated Kinases, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Binding Sites, Enzyme Activation, Growth Substances, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Phosphoserine, Phosphothreonine, Protein Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Recombinant Proteins, Signal Transduction, Conserved Sequence, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Immediate-Early Proteins, Amino Acid Motifs, Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 90-kDa, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Mice, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, 3-Phosphoinositide-Dependent Protein Kinases, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review