Cited by 55Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisEconomic and Environmental Valuation

Regression discontinuity designs in agricultural and environmental economics

Open access
Wuepper, David, Finger, Robert·2023·European Review of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

Regression discontinuity designs (RDD) are increasingly being employed in agricultural and environmental economics to identify causal effects. Here, we showcase recent applications, identify best practices, discuss commonly invoked identifying assumptions and show how these can be tested. We discuss basic empirical issues and more advanced topics, including how to exploit the availability of panel data, models to explain heterogeneous treatment effects and extrapolation of local estimates. Moreover, we show how agricultural economists can leverage RDD in combination with remote sensing and environmental modelling. Finally, we highlight three areas of emerging opportunities and draw conclusions for research and policy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/erae/jbac023

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Double-difference estimators are particularly powerful at controlling for previously existing differences in policies if those differences do not change over time.

    “Moreover, doubledifference estimators are particularly powerful to control for previously existing differences in policies if they do not change over time 89,93 .”

    From Health benefits of reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (2024) · cites this paper as [93]

    Section 3.1 (page not available) says the difference-in-discontinuities design addresses pre-existing discontinuities and compound treatments, and its unit fixed effects control for time-invariant characteristics. That supports the idea of accounting for stable pre-existing differences, but the paper makes this point about a design combining regression discontinuity with difference-in-differences, not about double-difference estimators generally or specifically about unchanged differences in policies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. Abadie, A. and Cattaneo, M. D. (2018). Econometric methods for program evalua- tion. Annual Review of Economics 10: 465-503. 10.1146/annurev-economics-080217- 053402. Regression discontinuity designs in agricultural and environmental economics 23 · DOI
  2. Alix-Garcia, J., McIntosh, C., Sims, K. R. E. and Welch, J. R. (2013). The ecological foot- print of poverty alleviation: evidence from Mexico's Oportunidades Program. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(2): 417-435. 10.1162/REST_a_00349. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Alix-Garcia, J. M., Sims, K. R. E., Orozco-Olvera, V. H., Costica, L. E., Fernández Medina, J. D. and Romo Monroy, S. (2018). Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(27): 7016-7021. 10.1073/pnas.1720873115. · DOI
  4. Appau, S., Churchill, S. A., Smyth, R. and Trinh, T.-A. (2021). The long-term impact of the Vietnam War on agricultural productivity. World Development 146: 105613. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105613. · DOI
  5. Asher, S. and Novosad, P. (2017). Politics and local economic growth: evi- dence from India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(1): 229-273. 10.1257/app.20150512. · DOI
  6. Asher, S. and Novosad, P. (2020). Rural roads and local economic development. American Economic Review 110(3): 797-823. 10.1257/aer.20180268. · DOI
  7. Ayres, A. B., Meng, K. C., and Plantinga, A. J. (2021). Do environmental markets improve on open access? Evidence from California groundwater rights. Journal of Political Economy 129(10): 2817-2860.
  8. Bagues, M. and Campa, P. (2021). Can gender quotas in candidate lists empower women? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Public Economics 194: 104315. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104315. · DOI
  9. Bastin, J.-F., Finegold, Y., Garcia, C., Mollicone, D., Rezende, M., Routh, D., Zohner, C. M. and Crowther, T. W. (2019). The global tree restoration potential. Science 365(6448): 76-79. 10.1126/science.aax0848. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Behaghel, L., Macours, K. and Subervie, J. (2019). How can randomised controlled tri- als help improve the design of the common agricultural policy? European Review of Agricultural Economics 46(3): 473-493. 10.1093/erae/jbz021. · DOI
  11. Bonilla-Mejía, L. and Higuera-Mendieta, I. (2019). Protected areas under weak institu- tions: evidence from Colombia. World Development 122: 585-596. 10.1016/j.world- dev.2019.06.019. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Fleischer, L. R., Lugato, E., Ballabio, C., Alewell, C., Meusburger, K., Modugno, S., Schütt, B. and Ferro, V. (2017). An assessment of the global impact of twenty-first century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications 8(1): 2013. 10.1038/s41467-017-02142-7. · DOI
  13. Brown, M., Henchoz, C. and Spycher, T. (2018). Culture and financial literacy: evidence from a within-country language border. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 150: 62-85. 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.011. · DOI
  14. Burke, M., Driscoll, A., Lobell, D. B. and Ermon, S. (2021). Using satellite imagery to understand and promote sustainable development. Science 371(6535): 1-13. 10.1126/ science.abe8628. · DOI
  15. Butts, K. (2021). Geographic difference-in-discontinuities. Applied Economics Letters 1-5. 10.1080/13504851.2021.2005236. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D. and Farrell, M. H. (2020). Optimal bandwidth choice for robust bias-corrected inference in regression discontinuity designs. The Econometrics Journal 23(2): 192-210. 10.1093/ectj/utz022. · DOI
  17. Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., Farrell, M. H. and Titiunik, R. (2019). Regression disconti- nuity designs using covariates. The Review of Economics and Statistics 101(3): 442-451. 10.1162/rest_a_00760. · DOI
  18. Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D. and Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust nonparametric confi- dence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82(6): 2295-2326. 10.3982/ECTA11757. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Canay, I. A. and Kamat, V. (2018). Approximate permutation tests and induced order statistics in the regression discontinuity design. The Review of Economic Studies 85(3): 1577-1608. 10.1093/restud/rdx062. · DOI
  20. Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N. and Titiunik, R. (2020). A Practical Introduction to Regres- sion Discontinuity Designs: Foundations and Extensions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Cattaneo, M. D. and Titiunik, R. (2021). Regression discontinuity designs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.09400. · arXiv
  22. Cattaneo, M. D. and Vazquez-Bare, G. (2016). The choice of neighborhood in regression discontinuity designs. Observational Studies 2(134): A146. 10.1353/obs.2017.0002. · DOI
  23. Chang, H.-H. and Lin, T.-C. (2016). Does the minimum lot size program affect farm- land values? Empirical evidence using administrative data and regression discontinu- ity design in Taiwan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98(3): 785-801. 10.1093/ajae/aav064. · DOI
  24. Chang, H.-H. and Lin, T.-C. (2020). Does a farmland zoning program impact farm income: empirical evidence from farm households in Taiwan. European Review of Agricultural Economics 47(5): 1621-1643. 10.1093/erae/jbaa002. · DOI
  25. Chaplin, D. D., Cook, T. D., Zurovac, J., Coopersmith, J. S., Finucane, M. M., Vollmer, L. N. and Morris, R. E. (2018). The internal and external validity of the regression dis- continuity design: a meta-analysis of 15 within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 37(2): 403-429. 10.1002/pam.22051. · DOI
  26. Chen, Y., Shi, S. and Tang, Y. (2019). Valuing the urban hukou in China: evidence from a regression discontinuity design for housing prices. Journal of Development Economics 141: 102381. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102381. · DOI
  27. Colen, L., Gomez Y Paloma, S., Latacz-Lohmann, U., Lefebvre, M., Préget, R. and Thoyer, S. (2016). Economic experiments as a tool for agricultural policy evaluation: insights from the European CAP. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie 64(4): 667-694. 10.1111/cjag.12107. · DOI
  28. Cunningham, S. (2021). Causal Inference. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.
  29. Dedehouanou, S. F. A., Araar, A., Ousseini, A., Laouali Harouna, A. and Jabir, M. (2018). Spillovers from off-farm self-employment opportunities in Rural Niger. World Development 105: 428-442. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.005. · DOI
  30. Donaldson, D. and Storeygard, A. (2016). The view from above: applications of satellite data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(4): 171-198. 10.1257/jep.30.4.171. · DOI
  31. Dong, Y. and Lewbel, A. (2015). Identifying the effect of changing the policy threshold in regression discontinuity models. Review of Economics and Statistics 97(5): 1081-1092. 10.1162/REST_a_00510. · DOI
  32. Esposti, R. and Sotte, F. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural and rural poli- cies: an introduction. European Review of Agricultural Economics 40(4): 535-539. 10.1093/erae/jbt014. · DOI
  33. Eugster, B., Lalive, R., Steinhauer, A. and Zweimüller, J. (2017). Culture, work attitudes, and job search: evidence from the Swiss language border. Journal of the European Economic Association 15(5): 1056-1100. 10.1093/jeea/jvw024. · DOI
  34. Filippini, M. and Wekhof, T. (2021). The effect of culture on energy efficient vehi- cle ownership. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 105: 102400. 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102400. · DOI
  35. Finger, R. and El Benni, N. (2021). Farm income in European agriculture: new per- spectives on measurement and implications for policy evaluation. European Review of Agricultural Economics 48(2): 253-265. 10.1093/erae/jbab011. · DOI
  36. Frandsen, B. R., Fr ö lich, M. and Melly, B. (2012). Quantile treatment effects in the regression discontinuity design. Journal of Econometrics 168(2): 382-395. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.02.004. · DOI
  37. Garg, T. and Shenoy, A. (2021). The ecological impact of place-based economic policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 103(4): 1239-1250. 10.1111/ajae.12193. · DOI
  38. Ge, M., Edwards, E. C. and Akhundjanov, S. B. (2020). Irrigation investment on an American Indian reservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 102(4): 1083-1104. 10.1002/ajae.12077. · DOI
  39. Gelman, A. and Imbens, G. (2019). Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 37(3): 447-456. 10.1080/07350015.2017.1366909. · DOI
  40. Gleason, P., Resch, A. and Berk, J. (2018). RD or not RD: using experimental studies to assess the performance of the regression discontinuity approach. Evaluation Review 42(1): 3-33. 10.1177/0193841X18787267. · DOI
  41. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D. and Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment 202: 18-27. 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031. · DOI
  42. Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J. and Loveland, T. R. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342(6160): 850-853. 10.1126/sci- ence.1244693. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Hsu, Y.-C. and Shen, S. (2019). Testing treatment effect heterogeneity in regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Econometrics 208(2): 468-486. 10.1016/j.jeconom. 2018.10.004. · DOI
  44. Hsu, Y. and Shen, S. (2021). Testing monotonicity of conditional treatment effects under regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Applied Econometrics 36(3): 346-366. 10.1002/jae.2805. · DOI
  45. Huber, R., Flury, C. and Finger, R. (2015). Factors affecting farm growth intentions of family farms in mountain regions: empirical evidence for central Switzerland. Land Use Policy 47: 188-197. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.006. · DOI
  46. Imbens, G. and Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics 142(2): 615-635. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001. · DOI
  47. Jain, M. (2020). The benefits and pitfalls of using satellite data for causal inference. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 14(1): 157-169. 10.1093/reep/rez023. · DOI
  48. Jones, M., Kondylis, F., Loeser, J. and Magruder, J. (2022). Factor market failures and the adoption of irrigation in rwanda. American Economic Review 112(7): 2316-2352.
  49. Keele, L. J. and Titiunik, R. (2014). Geographic boundaries as regression discontinuities. Political Analysis 23(1): 127-155. 10.1093/pan/mpu014. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Khanna, G. and Zimmermann, L. (2017). Guns and butter? Fighting violence with the promise of development. Journal of Development Economics 124: 120-141. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.09.006. · DOI
  51. Lee, D. S. and Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature 48(2): 281-355. 10.1257/jel.48.2.281. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Lewis, D. J., Barham, B. L. and Robinson, B. (2011). Are there spatial spillovers in the adop- tion of clean technology? The case of organic dairy farming. Land Economics 87(2): 250-267. 10.3368/le.87.2.250. · DOI
  53. Lobell, D. B., Azzari, G., Burke, M., Gourlay, S., Jin, Z., Kilic, T. and Murray, S. (2019). Eyes in the sky, boots on the ground: assessing satellite-and ground-based approaches to crop yield measurement and analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 102: 202-219. 10.1093/ajae/aaz051. · DOI
  54. MacPherson, C. and Sterck, O. (2021). Empowering refugees through cash and agricul- ture: a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Development Economics 149: 102614. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102614. · DOI
  55. McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression dis- continuity design: a density test. Journal of Econometrics 142(2): 698-714. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Nguyen, T. C. and Rieger, M. (2017). Community-driven development and social capital: evidence from Morocco. World Development 91: 28-52. 10.1016/j.world- dev.2016.10.013. · DOI
  57. Noack, F., Larsen, A., Kamp, J. and Levers, C. (2022). A bird's eye view of farm size and biodiversity: the ecological legacy of the iron curtain. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 104(4): 1460-1484. 10.1111/ajae.12274. · DOI
  58. Nordin, M. and Lovén, I. (2020). Is the setting up aid mitigating the generational renewal problem in farming? European Review of Agricultural Economics 47(5): 1697-1715. 10.1093/erae/jbaa006. · DOI
  59. Pan, Y., Smith, S. C. and Sulaiman, M. (2018). Agricultural extension and technology adoption for food security: evidence from Uganda. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 100(4): 1012-1031. 10.1093/ajae/aay012. · DOI
  60. Potapov, P., Turubanova, S., Hansen, M., Tyukavina, A., Zalles, V., Khan, A., Song, X.-P., Pickens, A., Shen, Q. and Cortez, J. (2021). Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century. Nature Food 1-10. 10.1038/s43016-021-00429-z. · DOI
  61. Reguly, A ´. (2021). Heterogeneous treatment effects in regression discontinuity designs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11640. · arXiv
  62. Ruan, J., Cai, Q. and Jin, S. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 and nationwide lockdowns on vegetable prices: evidence from wholesale markets in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 103(5): 1574-1594. 10.1111/ajae.12211. · DOI
  63. Salazar, L., Aramburu, J., Agurto, M., Maffioli, A. and Fahsbender, J. (2020). Sweep- ing the flies away: evidence from a fruit fly eradication program. European Review of Agricultural Economics 47(5): 1920-1962. 10.1093/erae/jbaa015. · DOI
  64. Salman, M., Long, X., Wang, G. and Zha, D. (2022). Paris climate agreement and global environmental efficiency: new evidence from fuzzy regression discontinuity design. Energy Policy 168: 113128. 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113128. · DOI
  65. Schipmann, C. and Qaim, M. (2010). Spillovers from modern supply chains to traditional markets: product innovation and adoption by smallholders. Agricultural Economics 41(3-4): 361-371. 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00438.x. · DOI
  66. Shenoy, A. (2018). Regional development through place-based policies: evidence from a spatial discontinuity. Journal of Development Economics 130: 173-189. 10.1016/j.jde- veco.2017.10.001. · DOI
  67. Shi, X. (2022). Land reallocation responses to China's new rural pension scheme: evi- dence from a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Rural Studies 92: 35-49. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.018. · DOI
  68. Stoeffler, Q., Carter, M., Guirkinger, C. and Gelade, W. (2022). The spillover impact of index insurance on agricultural investment by cotton farmers in Burkina Faso. The World Bank Economic Review 36(1): 114-140. 10.1093/wber/lhab011. · DOI
  69. Storm, H., Baylis, K. and Heckelei, T. (2020). Machine learning in agricultural and applied economics. European Review of Agricultural Economics 47(3): 849-892. 10.1093/erae/jbz033. · DOI
  70. Turner, M. A., Haughwout, A. and Van Der Klaauw, W. (2014). Land use regulation and welfare. Econometrica 82(4): 1341-1403. 10.3982/ECTA9823. · DOI
  71. Wang, Y., Schaub, S., Wuepper, D. and Finger, R. (2022). Culture and agricultural biodi- versity conservation. Working paper, available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=4043727.
  72. Wing, C. and Bello-Gomez, R. A. (2018). Regression discontinuity and beyond: options for studying external validity in an internally valid design. American Journal of Evaluation 39(1): 91-108. 10.1177/1098214017736155. · DOI
  73. Wuepper, D., Borrelli, P. and Finger, R. (2020a). Countries and the global rate of soil erosion. Nature Sustainability 3(1): 51-55. 10.1038/s41893-019-0438-4. · DOI
  74. Wuepper, D., Le Clech, S., Zilberman, D., Mueller, N. and Finger, R. (2020b). Countries influence the trade-off between crop yields and nitrogen pollution. Nature Food 1(11): 713-719. 10.1038/s43016-020-00185-6. · DOI
  75. Wuepper, D., Wimmer, S. and Sauer, J. (2020c). Is small family farming more environmen- tally sustainable? Evidence from a spatial regression discontinuity design in Germany. Land Use Policy 90: 104360. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104360. · DOI
  76. Wuepper, D., Borrelli, P., Panagos, P., Lauber, T., Crowther, T., Thomas, A. and Robinson, D. A. (2021). A 'debt' based approach to land degradation as an indicator of global change. Global Change Biology 27(21): 5407-5410. 10.1111/gcb.15830. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wuepper, D., & Finger, R.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Wuepper, David
Venue
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Published
2022-10-06
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
1-28
ISSN
  • 0165-1587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3618
OpenAlex
W4304694909
Cited by
55
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Review of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
regression discontinuity design, causal inference, agricultural economics, environmental economics, treatment effect heterogeneity, panel data, remote sensing, environmental modeling, identifying assumptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review