Cited by 94Cardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

What is the most cost-effective strategy to screen for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: natriuretic peptides, the electrocardiogram, hand-held echocardiography, traditional echocardiography, or their combination?

Open access
Galasko, Gavin I.W., Barnes, Sophie C., Collinson, Paul, Lahiri, Avijit, Senior, Roxy·2006·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the screening characteristics and cost-effectiveness of screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in community subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1392 members of the general public and 928 higher risk subjects were randomly selected from seven community practices. Attending subjects underwent an ECG, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) serum levels, and traditional echocardiography (TE). A total of 533 consecutive subjects underwent hand-held echocardiography (HE). The screening characteristics and cost-effectiveness (cost per case of LVSD diagnosed) of eight strategies to predict LVSD (LVSD <45% on TE) were compared. A total of 1205 subjects attended. Ninety six per cent of subjects with LVSD in the general population had identifiable risk factors. All screening strategies gave excellent negative predictive value. Screening high-risk subjects was most cost-effective, screening low-risk subjects least cost-effective. TE screening was the least cost-effective strategy. NTproBNP screening gave similar cost savings to ECG screening; HE screening greater cost-savings, and HE screening following NTproBNP or ECG pre-screening the greatest cost-savings, costing approximately 650 Euros per case of LVSD diagnosed in high-risk subjects (63% cost-savings vs.TE). CONCLUSION: Thus several different modalities allow cost-effective community-based screening for LVSD, especially in high-risk subjects. Such programmes would be cost-effective and miss few cases of LVSD in the community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi559

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Artificial intelligence can detect LVSD from ECGs.

    “Artificial intelligence (AI) can detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) from electrocardiograms (ECGs)”

    From Detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction from single-lead electrocardiography adapted for portable and wearable devices (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that ECG screening had high sensitivity for predicting LVSD in community subjects. The Electrocardiography section describes screening based on specified ECG abnormalities, but the paper does not report using artificial intelligence to detect LVSD. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Jong P, Yusuf S, Rousseau MF, Ahn SA, Bangdiwala SI. Effect of enalapril on 12-year survival and life expectancy in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a follow-up study. Lancet 2003;361:1843-1848.
  2. Remes J, Miettinen H, Reunanen A, Pyorala K. Validity of clinical diagno- sis of heart failure in primary health care. Eur Heart J 1991;12:315-321.
  3. Petrie MC, Hogg K, Caruana L, McMurray JJV. Poor concordance of commonly used echocardiographic measures of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with suspected heart failure but preserved systolic function: is there a reliable echocardiographic measure of diastolic dysfunction? Heart 2004;90:511-517.
  4. Mosterd A, de Bruijne MC, Hoes AW, Deckers JW, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Usefulness of echocardiography in detecting left ventricular dysfunction in population-based studies (The Rotterdam Study). Am J Cardiol 1997; 79:103-104.
  5. Galasko GIW, Lahiri A, Senior R. Portable echocardiography: an innova- tive tool in screening for cardiac abnormalities in the community. Eur J Echocardiogr 2003;4:119-127.
  6. Khunti K, Squire I, Abrams KR, Sutton AJ. Accuracy of a 12-lead electro- cardiogram in screening patients with suspected heart failure for open access echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2004;6:571-576.
  7. McDonagh TA, Robb SD, Murdoch DR, Morton JJ, Ford I, Morrison CE, Tunstall-Pedoe H, McMurray JJ, Dargie HJ. Biochemical detection of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction. Lancet 1998;351:9-13.
  8. Bay M, Kirk V, Parner J, Hassager C, Nielsen H, Krogsgaard K, Trawinski J, Boesgaard S, Aldershvile J. NT-proBNP: a new diagnostic screening tool to differentiate between patients with normal and reduced left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Heart 2003;89:150-154.
  9. Galasko GIW, Senior R, Lahiri A. Ethnic differences in the prevalence and aetiology of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the community-The Harrow Heart Failure Watch. Heart 2004, in press.
  10. Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertro- phy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J 1949;37:161-186.
  11. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I. Recommendations for quan- titation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358-367.
  12. Task force for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure; European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treat- ment of chronic heart failure. Task force report. Eur Heart J 2001;22: 1527-1560.
  13. European study group on diastolic heart failure. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure. Working group report. Eur Heart J 1998;19:990-1003.
  14. de Lemos JA, McGuire DK, Drazner MH. B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular disease. Lancet 2003;362:316-322.
  15. Redfield MM, Rodeheffer RJ, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Burnett JC. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration: impact of age and gender. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:976-982.
  16. Nielsen OW, McDonagh TA, Robb SD, Dargie HJ. Retrospective analysis of the cost-effectiveness of using plasma brain natriuretic peptide in screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the general popu- lation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:113-120.
  17. Greaves K, Jeetley P, Hickman M, Dwivedi G, Sabharwal N, Lim T, Janard- hanan R, Senior R. The use of hand carried ultrasound in the hospital setting: A cost effective analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18: 620-625.
  18. Ng LL, Loke I, Davies JE, Khunti K, Stone M, Abrams KR, Chin DT, Squire IB. Identification of previously undiagnosed left ventricular systo- lic dysfunction: community screening using natriuretic peptides and elec- trocardiography. Eur J Heart Fail 2003;5:775-782.
  19. Redfield MM, Rodeheffer RJ, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Burnett Jr JC. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide to detect preclinical systolic or diastolic dysfunction. Circulation 2004;109:3176-3181.
  20. Caruana L, Petrie MC, Davie AP, McMurray JJV. Do patients with suspected heart failure and preserved left ventricular systolic function suffer from 'diastolic heart failure' or from misdiagnosis? A prospective descriptive study. BMJ 2000;321:215-218.
  21. Michel BC, Remme WJ, Kingma JH, Kragten JA, van Nieuwenhuizen R, van Hout BA. Economic aspects of treatment with captopril for patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in The Netherlands. Eur Heart J 1996;17:731-740.
  22. Glick H, Cook J, Kinosian B, Pitt B, Bourassa MG, Pouleur H, Gerth W. Costs and effects of enalapril therapy in patients with sympto- matic heart failure: an economic analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial. J Card Fail 1995; 1:371-380.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galasko, G. I. W., Barnes, S. C., Collinson, P., Lahiri, A., & Senior, R.
Affiliations
  • Northwick Park Hospital (GB)
  • St George's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Galasko, Gavin I.W.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2005-11-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
193-200
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2183065534
Cited by
94
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
left ventricular systolic dysfunction, cardiovascular screening, cost-effectiveness, natriuretic peptides, NT-proBNP, electrocardiogram, handheld echocardiography, vulnerable populations, community-based screening, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Echocardiography, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Systole, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Natriuretic Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review