Cited by 206Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Health and Mental Health

Combined endurance-resistance training vs. endurance training in patients with chronic heart failure: a prospective randomized study

Beckers, P. J., Denollet, J., Possemiers, N. M., Wuyts, F. L., Vrints, C. J., Conraads, V. M.·2008·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: This study was designed to compare the effects of combined endurance-resistance training (CT) with endurance training (ET) only on submaximal and maximal exercise capacity, ventilatory prognostic parameters, safety issues, and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight CHF patients (NYHA class II-III) were randomized either to 6 months CT [n = 28, 58 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 26%, VO(2)peak 18.1 mL/kg/min] or ET (n = 30, 59 years, LVEF 23%, VO(2)peak 21.3 mL/kg/min). The increase in steady-state workload (P = 0.007) and the decrease in heart rate at SSW (P = 0.002) were significantly larger in CT- compared with ET-trained patients. Maximal exercise capacity (i.e. VO(2)peak, maximal workload) and work-economy (Wattmax/VO(2)peak) evolved similarly. VO(2)peak halftime was reduced following CT (P = 0.001). Maximal strength in upper limbs increased significantly (P < 0.001) in favour of the CT group. CT also had a beneficial effect on health-related quality of life, i.e. 60% of CT-trained patients vs. 28% of ET-trained patients reported a decrease in cardiac symptoms (OR = 3.86, 95% CI 1.11-12.46, P = 0.03). There were no differences with regard to improved LVEF, evolution of left ventricular dimensions, nor outcome data (mortality and cardiovascular hospital admissions during follow-up). CONCLUSION: In CHF patients, CT had a more pronounced effect on submaximal exercise capacity, muscle strength, and quality of life. The absence of unfavourable effects on left ventricular remodelling and outcome parameters is reassuring and might facilitate further implementation of this particular training modality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn222

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resistance exercise is an effective means of combating the loss of muscle mass and function in a variety of populations.

    “Although not specifically evaluated in older adults during bed rest, there is clear evidence that resistance exercise is an effective means of combating the loss of muscle mass and function in a variety of populations [25-34].”
  • In a cohort of chronic heart failure patients, improvements in strength, VO2peak, work capacity, and economy were identified following a resistance and endurance exercise program.

    “Specifically, in a cohort of chronic heart failure patients, improvements in strength, VO2peak, work capacity, and economy were identified following a resistance and endurance exercise program [25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beckers, P. J., Denollet, J., Possemiers, N. M., Wuyts, F. L., Vrints, C. J., & Conraads, V. M.
Affiliations
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Beckers, P. J.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2008-07-10
Volume
29
Issue
15
Pages
1858-1866
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2150763580
Cited by
206
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
45.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
chronic heart failure, endurance training, exercise capacity, submaximal exercise, maximal exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, muscle strength, health-related quality of life, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular remodeling, cardiac rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Exercise Therapy, Female, Heart Failure, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Respiratory Muscles, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Ventricular Remodeling, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review