Cited by 154Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Comparison of cardiac surgery with left atrial surgical ablation vs. cardiac surgery without atrial ablation in patients with coronary and/or valvular heart disease plus atrial fibrillation: final results of the PRAGUE-12 randomized multicentre study

Open access
Budera, P., Straka, Z., Osmancik, P., Vanek, T., Jelinek, S., Hlavicka, J., Fojt, R., Cervinka, P. +4 more·2012·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Surgical ablation procedure can restore sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cardiac surgery. However, it is not known whether it has any impact on long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre study randomized 224 patients with AF scheduled for valve and/or coronary surgery: group A (left atrial surgical ablation, n = 117) vs. group B (no ablation, n = 107). The primary efficacy outcome was the SR presence (without any AF episode) during a 24 h electrocardiogram (ECG) after 1 year. The primary safety outcome was the combined endpoint of death/myocardial infarction/stroke/renal failure at 30 days. A Holter-ECG after 1 year revealed SR in 60.2% of group A patients vs. 35.5% in group B (P = 0.002). The combined safety endpoint at 30 days occurred in 10.3% (group A) vs. 14.7% (group B, P = 0.411). All-cause 1-year mortality was 16.2% (A) vs. 17.4% (B, P = 0.800). Stroke occurred in 2.7% (A) vs. 4.3% (B) patients (P = 0.319). No difference (A vs. B) in SR was found among patients with paroxysmal (61.9 vs. 58.3%) or persistent (72 vs. 50%) AF, but ablation significantly increased SR prevalence in patients with longstanding persistent AF (53.2 vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical ablation improves the likelihood of SR presence post-operatively without increasing peri-operative complications. However, the higher prevalence of SR did not translate to improved clinical outcomes at 1 year. Further follow-ups (e.g. 5-year) are warranted to show any potential clinical benefit which might occur later.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs290

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple observational studies indicate the feasibility and safety of surgical LAA occlusion/exclusion, but only limited controlled trial data are available.

    “Multiple observational studies indicate the feasibility and safety of surgical LAA occlusion/exclusion, but only limited controlled trial data are available.[461][462][463][464]”
  • The Cox maze procedure and other forms of atrial fibrillation surgery have mainly been used in patients undergoing other open heart surgical procedures.

    “The Cox maze procedure and other, often simpler, forms of AF surgery have mainly been used in patients undergoing other open heart surgical procedures.461,466,[784][785][786][787][788][789][790][791][792][793][794][795][796][797][798]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Budera, P., Straka, Z., Osmancik, P., Vanek, T., Jelinek, S., Hlavicka, J., Fojt, R., Cervinka, P., Hulman, M., Smid, M., Maly, M., & Widimsky, P.
Affiliations
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (SK)
Corresponding author
Budera, P.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2012-08-28
Volume
33
Issue
21
Pages
2644-2652
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2099755014
Cited by
154
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Univerzita Karlova v Praze (MSM 0021620817, UNCE 204010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, cardiac surgery, sinus rhythm restoration, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, postoperative outcomes, stroke, mortality, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, persistent atrial fibrillation
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Disease, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Valve Diseases, Humans, Male, Postoperative Care, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Operative Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review