Cited by 35Digital Mental Health InterventionsCardiac Health and Mental HealthTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Efficacy of a web-based intervention for improving psychosocial well-being in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: the randomized controlled ICD-FORUM trial

Open access
Schulz, Stefan M, Ritter, Oliver, Zniva, Richard, Nordbeck, Peter, Wacker, Christian, Jack, Mary, Groschup, Guido, Deneke, Thomas +5 more·2020·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life (QoL) are common in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Treatment options are limited and insufficiently defined. We evaluated the efficacy of a web-based intervention (WBI) vs. usual care (UC) for improving psychosocial well-being in ICD patients with elevated psychosocial distress. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 118 ICD patients with increased anxiety or depression [≥6 points on either subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)] or reduced QoL [≤16 points on the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)] from seven German sites (mean age 58.8 ± 11.3 years, 22% women). The primary outcome was a composite assessing change in heart-focused fear, depression, and mental QoL 6 weeks after randomization to WBI or UC, stratified for age, gender, and indication for ICD placement. Web-based intervention consisted of 6 weeks' access to a structured interactive web-based programme (group format) including self-help interventions based on cognitive behaviour therapy, a virtual self-help group, and on-demand support from a trained psychologist. Linear mixed-effects models analyses showed that the primary outcome was similar between groups (ηp2 = 0.001). Web-based intervention was superior to UC in change from pre-intervention to 6 weeks (overprotective support; P = 0.004, ηp2 = 0.036), pre-intervention to 1 year (depression, P = 0.004, ηp2 = 0.032; self-management, P = 0.03, ηp2 = 0.015; overprotective support; P = 0.02, ηp2 = 0.031), and 6 weeks to 1 year (depression, P = 0.02, ηp2 = 0.026; anxiety, P = 0.03, ηp2 = 0.022; mobilization of social support, P = 0.047, ηp2 = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Although the primary outcome was neutral, this is the first RCT showing that WBI can improve psychosocial well-being in ICD patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz134

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Herrmann C, Buss U. Vorstellung und Validierung einer deutschen Version der “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” (HAD-Skala). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung des psychischen Befindens bei Patienten mit körperlichen Beschwerden. Diagnostica 1994; 40: 143– 154.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulz, S. M., Ritter, O., Zniva, R., Nordbeck, P., Wacker, C., Jack, M., Groschup, G., Deneke, T., Puppe, F., Ertl, G., Angermann, C., Störk, S., & Pauli, P.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, ANregiomed—Hospital Rothenburg ob der Tauber , Ansbacher Straße 131, BY, 91541 Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Germany
  • Hospital Bad Wörishofen , Tannenbaum 2, BY, 86825 Bad Wörishofen, Germany
  • Klinikum Aschaffenburg (DE)
  • Department of Cardiology , Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Schlossplatz 1, BY, 97616 Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany
Corresponding author
  • Schulz, Stefan M
  • Pauli, Paul
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2019-04-08
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1203-1211
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2936703182
Cited by
35
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Comprehensive Heart Failure Center
  • Department of Medicine I
  • Division of Rhythmology
  • University Hospital Würzburg
  • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  • BMBF (01EO1004, 01EO1504)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, online intervention, psychosocial well-being, anxiety, depression, quality of life, cognitive behavioral therapy, self-help groups, social support, usual care comparison, patient mobilization, self-management, life satisfaction, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Defibrillators, Implantable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review