Cited by 393Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Health and Mental Health

A Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic Significance of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure

Open access
Mamas, Mamas A., Caldwell, Jane C., Chacko, Sanoj, Garratt, Clifford J., Fath-Ordoubadi, Farzin, Neyses, Ludwig·2009·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the commonest sustained arrhythmias in chronic heart failure (CHF), although the prognostic implications of the presence of AF in CHF remain controversial. We have therefore performed this meta-analysis to study the effects of the presence of AF on mortality in CHF patients. Methods and results: A systematic MEDLINE search for all randomized trials and observational studies in which the influence of AF on CHF mortality was investigated and meta-analysis of the mortality data was performed. A total of 16 studies were identified of which 7 were randomized trials and 9 were observational studies including 30 248 and 23 721 patients, respectively. An adjusted meta-analysis of the data revealed that the presence of AF is associated with an adverse effect on total mortality with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32–1.48, P < 0.0001] in randomized trials and an OR of 1.14 (95% CI 1.03–1.26, P < 0.05) in observational studies. This increase in mortality associated with the presence of AF was observed in subgroups of CHF patients with both preserved and impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Conclusion: In conclusion, meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 53 969 patients suggests that the presence of AF is associated with an adverse prognosis in CHF irrespective of LV systolic function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp085

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mamas, M. A., Caldwell, J. C., Chacko, S., Garratt, C. J., Fath-Ordoubadi, F., & Neyses, L.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary , Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL ,
Corresponding author
Mamas, Mamas A.
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2009-06-24
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
676-683
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2023008577
Cited by
393
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure, mortality, prognosis, left ventricular systolic function, preserved ejection fraction, cardiac arrhythmias
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, United Kingdom, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Ventricular Function, Left, Risk Assessment, Heart Failure, Systolic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review