Cited by 231Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringECG Monitoring and Analysis

HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of Techniques, Indications, Personnel, Frequency and Ethical Considerations

Wilkoff, Bruce L., Auricchio, Angelo, Brugada, Josep, Cowie, Martin, Ellenbogen, Kenneth A., Gillis, Anne M., Hayes, David L., Howlett, Jonathan G. +7 more·2008·Europace

Abstract

This document represents expert consensus concerning the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs). The views expressed are of the international writing group consisting of seven cardiac electrophysiologists representing the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), six from the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) as well as one heart failure specialist representing the Heart Failure Society of America and another from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Members from our writing group also represented the American College of Cardiology (Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD), the European Society of Cardiology (Silvia G. Priori, MD, PhD), and the American Heart Association (David L. Hayes, MD). The topic covered by this document includes the monitoring of CIEDs with a description of the technology, indications for use, personnel involved in monitoring and the frequency and types of monitoring events. Also covered are issues in regard to data management, regulatory environments, reimbursement and ethical considerations in respect to device inactivation. This statement summarizes the opinion of the writing group members based on their own experience in treating patients, as well as a review of the literature, and is directed to all health care professionals, health care institutions, CIED manufacturers and governmental, reimbursement and regulatory bodies who are involved in the care of patients with CIEDs. When using or considering the guidance given in this document, it is important to remember that the ultimate judgment regarding care of a particular patient must be made by the health care provider and patient in light of all the circumstances presented by that patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eun122

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These tests are rarely administered preventatively, despite research which concludes that preventative testing could reduce deaths by up to 25%.

    “Additionally, these tests are rarely administered preventatively, despite research which concludes that preventative testing could reduce deaths by up to 25% [1].”
  • RCIM has proven to be a promising route to deliver preventative care by reducing both the death rate and burdens placed on the healthcare system.

    “Remote and continuous/intermittent monitoring (RCIM) has proven to be a promising route to deliver preventative care by reducing both the death rate and burdens placed on the healthcare system [1,2,3].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkoff, B. L., Auricchio, A., Brugada, J., Cowie, M., Ellenbogen, K. A., Gillis, A. M., Hayes, D. L., Howlett, J. G., Kautzner, J., Love, C. J., Morgan, J. M., Priori, S. G., Reynolds, D. W., Schoenfeld, M. H., & Vardas, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino (CH)
  • University of Barcelona 3   Thorax Institute–Hospital Clinic , , Barcelona ,
  • 4  Imperial College London, NHLI, London, United Kingdom
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CZ)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • 11  Corner Cottage, Hampshire, United Kingdom
  • Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IT)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University Hospital of Heraklion (GR)
Venue
Europace
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
707-725
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W3040158654
Cited by
231
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
cardiac implantable electronic devices, cardiac pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, remote monitoring, data management, regulatory environment, reimbursement, ethical considerations, monitoring frequency
MeSH terms
Europe, Pacemaker, Artificial, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Defibrillators, Implantable, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review