Cited by 9Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasVestibular and auditory disorders

Epidemiological characteristics and diagnostic approach in patients admitted to the emergency room for transient loss of consciousness: Group for Syncope Study in the Emergency Room (GESINUR) study

Open access
Baron-Esquivias, G., Martinez-Alday, J., Martin, A., Moya, A., Garcia-Civera, R., Paz Lopez-Chicharro, M., Martin-Mendez, M., del Arco, C. +1 more·2010·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the clinical presentation and acute management of patients with transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS AND RESULTS: A multi-centre prospective observational study was carried out in 19 Spanish hospitals over 1 month. The patients included were > or =14 years old and were admitted to the ED because of an episode of T-LOC. Questionnaires and corresponding electrocardiograms (ECGs) were reviewed by a Steering Committee (SC) to unify diagnostic criteria, evaluate adherence to guidelines, and diagnose correctly the ECGs. We included 1419 patients (prevalence, 1.14%). ECG was performed in 1335 patients (94%) in the ED: 498 (37.3%) ECGs were classified as abnormal. The positive diagnostic yield ranged from 0% for the chest X-ray to 12% for the orthostatic test. In the ED, 1217 (86%) patients received a final diagnosis of syncope, whereas the remaining 202 (14%) were diagnosed of non-syncopal transient loss of consciousness (NST-LOC). After final review by the SC, 1080 patients (76%) were diagnosed of syncope, whereas 339 (24%) were diagnosed of NST-LOC (P < 0.001). Syncope was diagnosed correctly in 84% of patients. Only 25% of patients with T-LOC were admitted to hospitals. CONCLUSION: Adherence to clinical guidelines for syncope management was low; many diagnostic tests were performed with low diagnostic yield. Important differences were observed between syncope diagnoses at the ED and by SC decision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euq018

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More often extended monitoring is necessary because at the time of evaluation the cause of syncope remains elusive due to its transient and intermittent nature.

    “however, more often extended monitoring is necessary as at the time of the evaluation the cause of syncope remains elusive because of its transient and intermittent nature (Baron-Esquivias et al., 2010).”

    From 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry (2017) · cites this paper as Baron-Esquivias et al., 2010

    The “Final diagnosis at the ED” section (page not available) reports that the cause of syncope was unexplained in 28.5% of patients, supporting the point that evaluation can leave its cause undetermined. The paper does not say that extended monitoring is often necessary or attribute the diagnostic difficulty to syncope’s intermittent nature. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baron-Esquivias, G., Martinez-Alday, J., Martin, A., Moya, A., Garcia-Civera, R., Paz Lopez-Chicharro, M., Martin-Mendez, M., del Arco, C., & Laguna, P.
Affiliations
  • Hospital de Basurto (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa (ES)
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES)
  • Medtronic (Spain) (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES)
Venue
Europace
Published
2010-03-09
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
869-876
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W174504920
Cited by
8
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
syncope, transient loss of consciousness, emergency department, diagnostic yield, electrocardiogram, orthostatic test, chest radiography, clinical guideline adherence, diagnostic accuracy, hospitalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Electrocardiography, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spain, Unconsciousness, Incidence, Prevalence, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review