Cited by 120Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionHealth Policy Implementation SciencePrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Barriers and facilitators among health professionals in primary care to prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: a systematic review

Open access
Wändell, Per E, de Waard, Anne-Karien M, Holzmann, Martin J, Gornitzki, Carl, Lionis, Christos, de Wit, Niek, Søndergaard, Jens, Sønderlund, Anders L +5 more·2018·Family Practice

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify potential facilitators and barriers for health care professionals to undertake selective prevention of cardiometabolic diseases (CMD) in primary health care. We developed a search string for Medline, Embase, Cinahl and PubMed. We also screened reference lists of relevant articles to retain barriers and facilitators for prevention of CMD. We found 19 qualitative studies, 7 quantitative studies and 2 mixed qualitative and quantitative studies. In terms of five overarching categories, the most frequently reported barriers and facilitators were as follows: Structural (barriers: time restraints, ineffective counselling and interventions, insufficient reimbursement and problems with guidelines; facilitators: feasible and effective counselling and interventions, sufficient assistance and support, adequate referral, and identification of obstacles), Organizational (barriers: general organizational problems, role of practice, insufficient IT support, communication problems within health teams and lack of support services, role of staff, lack of suitable appointment times; facilitators: structured practice, IT support, flexibility of counselling, sufficient logistic/practical support and cooperation with allied health staff/community resources, responsibility to offer and importance of prevention), Professional (barriers: insufficient counselling skills, lack of knowledge and of experience; facilitators: sufficient training, effective in motivating patients), Patient-related factors (barriers: low adherence, causes problems for patients; facilitators: strong GP-patient relationship, appreciation from patients), and Attitudinal (barriers: negative attitudes to prevention; facilitators: positive attitudes of importance of prevention). We identified several frequently reported barriers and facilitators for prevention of CMD, which may be used in designing future implementation and intervention studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmx137

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Huy C, Diehm C, Schneider S. Cardiovascular prevention at the general practitioner? First results of a study on attitudes, services, success and bar- riers in practice. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2012; 137: 17-22.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wändell, P. E., de Waard, A.-K. M., Holzmann, M. J., Gornitzki, C., Lionis, C., de Wit, N., Søndergaard, J., Sønderlund, A. L., Kral, N., Seifert, B., Korevaar, J. C., Schellevis, F. G., & Carlsson, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Department of General Practice, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Carlsson, Axel C
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2018-01-29
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
383-398
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2793231057
Cited by
120
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Union’s Health Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
cardiometabolic disease prevention, barriers and facilitators, clinician attitudes, patient counseling, time constraints, reimbursement, referral, GP-patient relationship, patient adherence, professional training
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Cardiovascular Diseases, Health Personnel, Humans, Metabolic Diseases, Preventive Health Services, Primary Health Care, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review