Cited by 30Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMarine and coastal ecosystemsAlgal biology and biofuel production

Towards a mechanistic understanding of microalgae–bacteria interactions: integration of metabolomic analysis and computational models

Daly, Giulia, Ghini, Veronica, Adessi, Alessandra, Fondi, Marco, Buchan, Alison, Viti, Carlo·2022·FEMS Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

Interactions amongst marine microalgae and heterotrophic bacteria drive processes underlying major biogeochemical cycles and are important for many artificial systems. These dynamic and complex interactions span the range from cooperative to competitive, and it is the diverse and intricate networks of metabolites and chemical mediators that are predicted to principally dictate the nature of the relationship at any point in time. Recent advances in technologies to identify, analyze, and quantify metabolites have allowed for a comprehensive view of the molecules available for exchange and/or reflective of organismal interactions, setting the stage for development of mechanistic understanding of these systems. Here, we (i) review the current knowledge landscape of microalgal–bacterial interactions by focusing on metabolomic studies of selected, simplified model systems; (ii) describe the state of the field of metabolomics, with specific focus on techniques and approaches developed for microalga–bacterial interaction studies; and (iii) outline the main approaches for development of mathematical models of these interacting systems, which collectively have the power to enhance interpretation of experimental data and generate novel testable hypotheses. We share the viewpoint that a comprehensive and integrated series of -omics approaches that include theoretical formulations are necessary to develop predictive and mechanistic understanding of these biological entities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/femsre/fuac020

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Daly, G., Ghini, V., Adessi, A., Fondi, M., Buchan, A., & Viti, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Consorzio Interuniversitario Risonanze Magnetiche di Metallo Proteine (IT)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Adessi, Alessandra
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Published
2022-05-14
Volume
46
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6976
OpenAlex
W4280544239
Cited by
30
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (OCE-1357242)
  • Simons Foundation (735083)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
Keywords
microalgae-bacteria interactions, heterotrophic bacteria, marine microalgae, metabolomics, mathematical modeling, chemical mediators, metabolite exchange, competition and cooperation, biogeochemical cycles, model systems
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Computer Simulation, Models, Biological, Metabolomics, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review