The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leaf Area and Above- and Belowground Growth Responses of Loblolly Pine to Nutrient and Water Additions
Open accessAbstract
A 2 x 2 nutrient and water factorial experiment with four replications was installed in an 8-yr-old stand of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) growing on an infertile, excessively drained sandy site in Scotland County, North Carolina. After the fourth year of treatment, estimated stem volume increment, total biomass production, and peak leaf area index (LAI) increased 152%, 99%, and 101%, respectively, with fertilization and 25%, 23%, 16%, respectively, with irrigation. Stem volume growth efficiency (growth per unit LAI) increased 21% with fertilization, 9% with irrigation, and 30% with both fertilization and irrigation. Total biomass production efficiency increased 91% with fertilization, 29% with irrigation, and 120% with both fertilization and irrigation. The observed increase in stem volume growth efficiency may have been due, in part, to changes in biomass partitioning. However, altered partitioning patterns alone did not explain the observed increase in total biomass production efficiency. We hypothesized that the change in total biomass production efficiency may have been a result of greater allocation to foliage (photosynthesizing tissue) and less allocation to fine roots (a high maintenance respiration tissue) under fertilization and irrigation treatments. For. Sci. 44(2):317-328.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Logarithmic Regression in the Estimation of Plant Biomass
Baskerville, G. L. (1972) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x72-009 · Cited by 1,158
An Approach Toward a Rational Classification of Climate
THORNTHWAITE, C. W. (1948) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-194807000-00007 · Cited by 1,081
Production, Turnover, and Nutrient Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Detritus of World Forests
Vogt, K. A., Grier, C. C., & Vogt, D. J. (1986) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60122-1 · Cited by 962
Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends
Raich, J. W., & Nadelhoffer, K. J. (1989) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938194 · Cited by 796
Keyes, M. R., & Grier, C. C. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x81-082 · Cited by 531
Productivity of Temperate, Deciduous and Evergreen Forests
Jarvis, P. G., & Leverenz, J. W. (1983) · Physiological Plant Ecology IV · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-68156-1_9 · Cited by 505
Haynes, B. E., & Gower, S. T. (1995) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/15.5.317 · Cited by 426
Carbon Dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas‐Fir: Influence of Water and Nutrient Availability
Gower, S. T., Vogt, K. A., & Grier, C. C. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937170 · Cited by 412
Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems
Santantonio, D., Hermann, R. K., & Overton, W. S. (1977) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/s0031-4056(23)00138-5 · Cited by 340
Leaf Area, Stemwood Growth, and Nutrition Relationships in Loblolly Pine
Vose, J. M., & Allen, H. L. (1988) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forestscience/34.3.547 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Cited by
Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere
Oren, R., Ellsworth, D. S., Johnsen, K. H., Phillips, N., Ewers, B. E., Maier, C., Schäfer, K. V. R., McCarthy, H., Hendrey, G., McNulty, S. G., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35078064 · Cited by 1,084
Niinemets, Ü. (2010) · Ecological Research · doi:10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4 · Cited by 676
HENDRICKS, J. J., HENDRICK, R. L., WILSON, C. A., MITCHELL, R. J., PECOT, S. D., & GUO, D. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01067.x · Cited by 406
Bergh, J., Linder, S., Lundmark, T., & Elfving, B. (1999) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00509-x · Cited by 338
Rytter, R.-M. (2013) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpt060 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Albaugh, T. J., Allen, H. L., Dougherty, P. M., Kress, L. W., & King, J. S.
- Venue
- Forest Science
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 317-328
- ISSN
- 0015-749X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3738
- OpenAlex
- W223009492
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 23.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
