Cited by 51Ion Channels and ReceptorsMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyIon channel regulation and function

The rise and fall of TRP-N, an ancient family of mechanogated ion channels, in Metazoa

Open access
Schüler, Andreas, Schmitz, Gregor, Reft, Abigail, Özbek, Suat, Thurm, Ulrich, Bornberg-Bauer, Erich·2015·Genome Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Mechanoreception, the sensing of mechanical forces, is an ancient means of orientation and communication and tightly linked to the evolution of motile animals. In flies, the transient-receptor-potential N protein (TRP-N) was found to be a cilia-associated mechanoreceptor. TRP-N belongs to a large and diverse family of ion channels. Its unusually long N-terminal repeat of 28 ankyrin domains presumably acts as the gating spring by which mechanical energy induces channel gating. We analyzed the evolutionary origins and possible diversification of TRP-N. Using a custom-made set of highly discriminative sequence profiles we scanned a representative set of metazoan genomes and subsequently corrected several gene models. We find that, contrary to other ion channel families, TRP-N is remarkably conserved in its domain arrangements and copy number (1) in all Bilateria except for amniotes, even in the wake of several whole-genome duplications. TRP-N is absent in Porifera but present in Ctenophora and Placozoa. Exceptional multiplications of TRP-N occurred in Cnidaria, independently along the Hydra and the Nematostella lineage. Molecular signals of subfunctionalization can be attributed to different mechanisms of activation of the gating spring. In Hydra this is further supported by in situ hybridization and immune staining, suggesting that at least three paralogs adapted to nematocyte discharge, which is key for predation and defense. We propose that these new candidate proteins help explain the sensory complexity of Cnidaria which has been previously observed but so far has lacked a molecular underpinning. Also, the ancient appearance of TRP-N supports a common origin of important components of the nervous systems in Ctenophores, Cnidaria, and Bilateria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gbe/evv091

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analyses of the opsin gene family and ion-channel proteins involved in mechanoreception are consistent with a close relationship between Ctenophora, Cnidaria, and Bilateria.

    “Likewise, analyses of the opsin gene family, which is involved in light detection in animals, as well as ion-channel proteins involved in mechanoreception, are consistent with a close relationship between Ctenophora, Cnidaria, and Bilateria (50, 51).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Benson DA Karsch-Mizrachi I Lipman DJ Ostell J Wheeler DL 2005 Genbank. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: D34– D38. 15608212 PMC540017
  2. Ganfornina MD Sánchez D 1999 Generation of evolutionary novelty by functional shift. Bioessays 21: 432– 439. 10376014
  3. Krogh A Larsson B von Heijne G Sonnhammer EL 2001 Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 305: 567– 580. 11152613

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schüler, A., Schmitz, G., Reft, A., Özbek, S., Thurm, U., & Bornberg-Bauer, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
Genome Biology and Evolution
Published
2015-06
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
1713-1727
ISSN
1759-6653 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2203280675
Cited by
51
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Genome Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • URN:NBN Resolver for Germany & Switzerland (German National Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1306604)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Volkswagen Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
mechanosensitive ion channels, mechanoreception, ankyrin repeat domain, channel gating, ion channel evolution, whole-genome duplication, subfunctionalization, gene family expansion, Cnidaria, Hydra, Nematostella, Ctenophora, Placozoa, sponges, nervous system evolution, metazoan genomes
MeSH terms
Animals, Cnidaria, Multigene Family, Hydra, Ion Channels, Phylogeny, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Gene Dosage, Evolution, Molecular, Transient Receptor Potential Channels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review