Cited by 90RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA Research and Splicing

Comparative context analysis of codon pairs on an ORFeome scale

Open access
Moura, Gabriela, Pinheiro, Miguel, Silva, Raquel, Miranda, Isabel, Afreixo, Vera, Dias, Gaspar, Freitas, Adelaide, Oliveira, José L +1 more·2005·Genome Biology

Abstract

Codon context is an important feature of gene primary structure that modulates mRNA decoding accuracy. We have developed an analytical software package and a graphical interface for comparative codon context analysis of all the open reading frames in a genome (the ORFeome). Using the complete ORFeome sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Candida albicans and Escherichia coli, we show that this methodology permits large-scale codon context comparisons and provides new insight on the rules that govern the evolution of codon-pair context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-r28

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Codon pair preference has been found in every species studied and can be radically dissimilar between phylogenetically distant species.

    “Codon pair preference has been found in every species studied and can be radically dissimilar between phylogenetically distant species (Moura et al., 2005;Mueller et al., 2010).”

    From Codon Pair Bias Is a Direct Consequence of Dinucleotide Bias (2016) · cites this paper as Moura et al., 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moura, G., Pinheiro, M., Silva, R., Miranda, I., Afreixo, V., Dias, G., Freitas, A., Oliveira, J. L., & Santos, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Aveiro (PT)
Corresponding author
Santos, Manuel AS
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2005-02-15
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
R28-R28
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2128742161
Cited by
90
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (POCTI/BME/39030/2001, SFRH/BPD/7195/2001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
codon context, open reading frames, ORFeome, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, comparative genomics
MeSH terms
Candida albicans, Codon, Escherichia coli, RNA, Messenger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces, Software, Cluster Analysis, Open Reading Frames, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review