Cited by 107RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA modifications and cancer

Large scale comparative codon-pair context analysis unveils general rules that fine-tune evolution of mRNA primary structure

Open access
Moura, Gabriela, Pinheiro, Miguel, Arrais, Joel, Gomes, Ana Cristina, Carreto, Laura, Freitas, Adelaide, Oliveira, José L., Santos, Manuel A. S.·2007·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Codon usage and codon-pair context are important gene primary structure features that influence mRNA decoding fidelity. In order to identify general rules that shape codon-pair context and minimize mRNA decoding error, we have carried out a large scale comparative codon-pair context analysis of 119 fully sequenced genomes. METHODOLOGIES/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have developed mathematical and software tools for large scale comparative codon-pair context analysis. These methodologies unveiled general and species specific codon-pair context rules that govern evolution of mRNAs in the 3 domains of life. We show that evolution of bacterial and archeal mRNA primary structure is mainly dependent on constraints imposed by the translational machinery, while in eukaryotes DNA methylation and tri-nucleotide repeats impose strong biases on codon-pair context. CONCLUSIONS: The data highlight fundamental differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic mRNA decoding rules, which are partially independent of codon usage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0000847

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main selective effects on codon context are found in the nucleotides following the codon in the 3' direction.

    “The main selective effects on codon context are found in the nucleotides following the codon in the 3' direction [16,18,19,22].”

    From Preferred and avoided codon pairs in three domains of life (2008) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the strongest neighboring-nucleotide influence arises from the interplay between a codon’s last nucleotide and the next codon’s first nucleotide. The Results section on genome and translation biases likewise finds that this pair discriminates codon-pair preferences. These passages support an important role for a nucleotide in the 3′ direction, but not the claim that the main effects reside in the following nucleotides alone. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Closely related species have similar codon pair bias.

    “A comparison of CPSs derived from different organisms (Figure 1; Figure S1) confirmed that closely related species have a similar codon pair bias (CPB) (Moura et al., 2007;Shen et al., 2015).”

    From Codon Pair Bias Is a Direct Consequence of Dinucleotide Bias (2016) · cites this paper as Moura et al., 2007

  • Dinucleotide bias appears to be linked with codon pair bias.

    “Dinucleotide bias also appears to be linked with codon pair bias (Moura et al., 2007;Shen et al., 2015), but this relationship has not been thoroughly explored.”

    From Codon Pair Bias Is a Direct Consequence of Dinucleotide Bias (2016) · cites this paper as Moura et al., 2007

  • Specific preferred or avoided nucleotide patterns differ among species.

    “It has been found that the specific preferred or avoided nucleotide patterns differ among species [16,22].”

    From Preferred and avoided codon pairs in three domains of life (2008) · cites this paper as [22]

  • The only universal context selection rule found to cover all three domains of life was the avoidance of most codon pairs of the nnUAnn type, which was suggested to result from rejection of TA dinucleotides in DNA sequences.

    “Previously, the only universal context selection rule found to cover all three domains of life was the avoidance of most codon pairs of the nnUAnn type, which was suggested to result from rejection of TA dinucleotides in DNA sequences [22].”

    From Preferred and avoided codon pairs in three domains of life (2008) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moura, G., Pinheiro, M., Arrais, J., Gomes, A. C., Carreto, L., Freitas, A., Oliveira, J. L., & Santos, M. A. S.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (PT)
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
Corresponding author
Santos, Manuel A. S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2007-09-05
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
e847
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058323291
Cited by
107
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
codon usage, translation machinery, DNA methylation, trinucleotide repeats, comparative genomics, three domains of life
MeSH terms
Codon, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Messenger, Open Reading Frames, Evolution, Molecular, RNA, Archaeal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review