Cited by 529Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionNutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older Adults

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparison of Leg Power and Leg Strength Within the InCHIANTI Study: Which Influences Mobility More?

Bean, J. F., Leveille, S. G., Kiely, D. K., Bandinelli, S., Guralnik, J. M., Ferrucci, L.·2003·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a clinical study evaluating the functioning of mobility-limited elders, muscle power accounted for more of the variation in function than strength did. There was also evidence that the power-function relationship may be described as curvilinear. However, these findings have never been confirmed in a representative population. METHODS: An analysis was conducted using data from the InCHIANTI study, a population-based cohort of 1032 adults living in Italy. To assess the relationships between impairments in power and strength and mobility performance, we created separate multivariate linear and log-transformed regression models as well as separate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Subjects were age > or = 65 years, predominantly female (54%), with a mean age of 74.2 years, and most had mild-moderate mobility limitations (Short Physical Performance Battery score 10.5 +/- 2.1). Though leg extension power and isometric hip extension strength were closely associated, in several separate multivariate linear regression models, leg power consistently explained more of the variance than strength did in several measures of physical performance. Differences were even larger when observed in curvilinear models of power and strength. Using separate multivariate logistic regression models to examine the odds ratios for mobility limitations in persons with low muscle power versus high muscle power, and in persons with low muscle strength versus high muscle strength, we found that both factors influenced risk for mobility limitations, but low power was associated with a 2-3-fold greater likelihood than low strength. CONCLUSION: These findings identified muscle power to be a more influential proximal determinant of physical performance than impairments in strength and emphasized muscle power as an important determinant of mobility skills in older adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/58.8.m728

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 1995, Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 50, 55
  2. 1999, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31, S378
  3. 1999, Aging, 11, 287
  4. 1994, Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 49, M85
  5. 2002, Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 57A, M751
  6. Lexell, 1991, Journal of Anatomy, 174, 239
  7. 2000, Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 55A, M221

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–527 of 527

Metadata

Authors
Bean, J. F., Leveille, S. G., Kiely, D. K., Bandinelli, S., Guralnik, J. M., & Ferrucci, L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani (IT)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
M728-M733
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2172236533
Cited by
529
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
35.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hartford Foundation for Public Giving
  • National Institute on Aging (K12-AG00294, K12AG000294)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
muscle power, muscle strength, leg extension power, mobility limitations, physical performance, older adults, power function relationship, curvilinear relationship, InCHIANTI cohort
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Leg, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Muscles, Geriatric Assessment, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review