The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterizing Frailty Status in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) is testing whether a lower systolic blood pressure (BP) target of 120 mm Hg leads to a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among hypertensive, nondiabetic adults. Because there may be detrimental effects of intensive BP control, particularly in older, frail adults, we sought to characterize frailty within SPRINT to address ongoing questions about the ability of large-scale trials to enroll representative samples of noninstitutionalized, community-dwelling, older adults. METHODS: We constructed a 36-item frailty index (FI) in 9,306 SPRINT participants, classifying participants as fit (FI ≤ 0.10), less fit (0.10 < FI ≤ 0.21), or frail (FI > 0.21). Recurrent event models were used to evaluate the association of the FI with the incidence of self-reported falls, injurious falls, and all-cause hospitalizations. RESULTS: The distribution of the FI was comparable with what has been observed in population studies, with 2,570 (27.6%) participants classified as frail. The median FI was 0.18 (interquartile range = 0.14 to 0.24) in participants aged 80 years and older (N = 1,159), similar to the median FI of 0.17 reported for participants in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial. In multivariable analyses, a 1% increase in the FI was associated with increased risk for self-reported falls (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.030), injurious falls (HR = 1.035), and all-cause hospitalizations (HR = 1.038) (all p values < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Large clinical trials assessing treatments to reduce cardiovascular disease risk, such as SPRINT, can enroll heterogeneous populations of older adults, including the frail elderly, comparable with general population cohorts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z · Cited by 1,927
Meta-analysis of the Impact of 9 Medication Classes on Falls in Elderly Persons
Woolcott, J. C. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.357 · Cited by 1,326
Theou, O., Brothers, T. D., Mitnitski, A., & Rockwood, K. (2013) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.12420 · Cited by 665 · cited 1×
“It is important to note that predictive validity for frailty measures is commonly assessed by examining their association with all-cause mortality (33,34).”
Background
Cited by
Williamson, J. D., Supiano, M. A., Applegate, W. B., Berlowitz, D. R., Campbell, R. C., Chertow, G. M., Fine, L. J., Haley, W. E., Hawfield, A. T., Ix, J. H., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.7050 · Cited by 1,261
Self-citationEffect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes
Berlowitz, D. R., Foy, C. G., Kazis, L. E., Bolin, L. P., Conroy, M. B., Fitzpatrick, P., Gure, T. R., Kimmel, P. L., Kirchner, K., Morisky, D. E., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1611179 · Cited by 282
Self-citationSink, K. M., Evans, G. W., Shorr, R. I., Bates, J. T., Berlowitz, D., Conroy, M. B., Felton, D. M., Gure, T., Johnson, K. C., Kitzman, D., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.15236 · Cited by 92
Self-citationSimpson, F. R., Pajewski, N. M., Nicklas, B., Kritchevsky, S., Bertoni, A., Ingram, F., Ojeranti, D., Espeland, M. A., & Trial, F. T. I. F. A. A. I. O. A. D. A. S. O. T. A. F. H. I. D. (. A. (2020) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glz197 · Cited by 66
Self-citationEspinoza, S. E., Woods, R. L., Ekram, A. R. M. S., Ernst, M. E., Polekhina, G., Wolfe, R., Shah, R. C., Ward, S. A., Storey, E., Nelson, M. R., et al. (2022) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glab340 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Pajewski, N. M., Williamson, J. D., Applegate, W. B., Berlowitz, D. R., Bolin, L. P., Chertow, G. M., Krousel-Wood, M. A., Lopez-Barrera, N., Powell, J. R., Roumie, C. L., Still, C., Sink, K. M., Tang, R., Wright, C. B., Supiano, M. A., & for the SPRINT Study Research Group
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-01-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 649-655
- ISSN
- 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-535X
- OpenAlex
- W2295988053
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterizing Frailty Status in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gerona/glv228
- The paper
- Pajewski, N. M., Williamson, J. D., Applegate, W. B., Berlowitz, D. R., Bolin, L. P., Chertow, G. M., Krousel-Wood, M. A., Lopez-Barrera, N., Powell, J. R., Roumie, C. L., Still, C., Sink, K. M., Tang, R., Wright, C. B., Supiano, M. A., & for the SPRINT Study Research Group. (2016). Characterizing Frailty Status in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glv228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.