Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterizing Frailty Status in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

Open access
Pajewski, Nicholas M., Williamson, Jeff D., Applegate, William B., Berlowitz, Dan R., Bolin, Linda P., Chertow, Glenn M., Krousel-Wood, Marie A., Lopez-Barrera, Nieves, Powell, James R., Roumie, Christianne L., Still, Carolyn, Sink, Kaycee M., Tang, Rocky, Wright, Clinton B., Supiano, Mark A., for the SPRINT Study Research Group·2016·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) is testing whether a lower systolic blood pressure (BP) target of 120 mm Hg leads to a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among hypertensive, nondiabetic adults. Because there may be detrimental effects of intensive BP control, particularly in older, frail adults, we sought to characterize frailty within SPRINT to address ongoing questions about the ability of large-scale trials to enroll representative samples of noninstitutionalized, community-dwelling, older adults. METHODS: We constructed a 36-item frailty index (FI) in 9,306 SPRINT participants, classifying participants as fit (FI ≤ 0.10), less fit (0.10 < FI ≤ 0.21), or frail (FI > 0.21). Recurrent event models were used to evaluate the association of the FI with the incidence of self-reported falls, injurious falls, and all-cause hospitalizations. RESULTS: The distribution of the FI was comparable with what has been observed in population studies, with 2,570 (27.6%) participants classified as frail. The median FI was 0.18 (interquartile range = 0.14 to 0.24) in participants aged 80 years and older (N = 1,159), similar to the median FI of 0.17 reported for participants in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial. In multivariable analyses, a 1% increase in the FI was associated with increased risk for self-reported falls (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.030), injurious falls (HR = 1.035), and all-cause hospitalizations (HR = 1.038) (all p values < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Large clinical trials assessing treatments to reduce cardiovascular disease risk, such as SPRINT, can enroll heterogeneous populations of older adults, including the frail elderly, comparable with general population cohorts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glv228

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Pajewski, N. M., Williamson, J. D., Applegate, W. B., Berlowitz, D. R., Bolin, L. P., Chertow, G. M., Krousel-Wood, M. A., Lopez-Barrera, N., Powell, J. R., Roumie, C. L., Still, C., Sink, K. M., Tang, R., Wright, C. B., Supiano, M. A., & for the SPRINT Study Research Group
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2016-01-11
Volume
71
Issue
5
Pages
649-655
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2295988053
Cited by
188
References
5
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterizing Frailty Status in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gerona/glv228
The paper
Pajewski, N. M., Williamson, J. D., Applegate, W. B., Berlowitz, D. R., Bolin, L. P., Chertow, G. M., Krousel-Wood, M. A., Lopez-Barrera, N., Powell, J. R., Roumie, C. L., Still, C., Sink, K. M., Tang, R., Wright, C. B., Supiano, M. A., & for the SPRINT Study Research Group. (2016). Characterizing Frailty Status in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glv228

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.