Cited by 63Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Regional Hippocampal Atrophy and Higher Levels of Plasma Amyloid-Beta Are Associated With Subjective Memory Complaints in Nondemented Elderly Subjects

Open access
Cantero, Jose L., Iglesias, Juan E., Van Leemput, Koen, Atienza, Mercedes·2016·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests a link between the presence of subjective memory complaints (SMC) and lower volume of the hippocampus, one of the first regions to show neuropathological lesions in Alzheimer's disease. However, it remains unknown whether this pattern of hippocampal atrophy is regionally specific and whether SMC are also paralleled by changes in peripheral levels of amyloid-beta (Aβ). METHODS: The volume of hippocampal subregions and plasma Aβ levels were cross-sectionally compared between elderly individuals with (SMC(+); N = 47) and without SMC (SMC(-); N = 48). Significant volume differences in hippocampal subregions were further correlated with plasma Aβ levels and with objective memory performance. RESULTS: Individuals with SMC exhibited significantly higher Aβ1-42 concentrations and lower volumes of CA1, CA4, dentate gyrus, and molecular layer compared with SMC(-) participants. Regression analyses further showed significant associations between lower volume of the dentate gyrus and both poorer memory performance and higher plasma Aβ1-42 levels in SMC(+) participants. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of SMC, lower volumes of specific hippocampal regions, and higher plasma Aβ1-42 levels could be conditions associated with aging vulnerability. If such associations are confirmed in longitudinal studies, the combination may be markers recommending clinical follow-up in nondemented older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glw022

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SCD is associated with a significant reduction in the volume of the cholinergic basal forebrain and the CA1 region of the hippocampus compared with HCs.

    “The findings have converged to suggest that SCD is associated with a significant reduction in the volume of the cholinergic basal forebrain and the CA1 region of the hippocampus compared with HCs [87–90].”

    From Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Abstract (p. 1) reports significantly lower CA1 volume in elderly participants with subjective memory complaints than in those without complaints; the Discussion (p. 4) confirms this comparison. The paper does not report a reduction in cholinergic basal forebrain volume, so it supports only the CA1 part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cantero, J. L., Iglesias, J. E., Van Leemput, K., & Atienza, M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2016-03-04
Volume
71
Issue
9
Pages
1210-1215
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2292533497
Cited by
63
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR14075)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB013565)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
subjective memory complaints, hippocampal atrophy, plasma amyloid-beta, amyloid-beta 42, dentate gyrus, CA1, CA4, molecular layer, memory performance, non-demented elderly
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review