Cited by 262Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Physical Activity and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review

Stephen, Ruth, Hongisto, Kristiina, Solomon, Alina, Lönnroos, Eija·2017·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

The current literature includes several studies investigating the association between physical activity and risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate available evidence on this association. Medline via PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched for original English language research articles assessing the relationship between physical activity and incident AD. The review was limited to prospective observational and intervention studies. Criteria for exclusion were studies focusing on individuals with dementia, cross-sectional study design, and case reports. The quality of included studies was assessed in 5 domains of bias. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The number of participants ranged from 176 to 5,698. Follow-up time varied from 1 to 34 years. Physical activity was inversely associated with risk of AD in most studies (n = 18). Leisure-time physical activity was particularly protective against AD, but not work-related physical activity. The risk of bias assessment showed that overall quality of evidence was moderate for 16 and low for 8 studies. Beyond all the available general recommendations for health promotion, current evidence does not allow to draw specific practical recommendations concerning the types, frequency, intensity, or duration of physical activity that may be protective against AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glw251

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical activity appears to decrease risk of dementia.

    “In contrast, physical activity appears to decrease risk. [119][120]0][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128]”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [123]

  • Eating a heart-healthy diet and increasing physical activity could delay the onset of AD.

    “Collectively, this suggests that eating a heart-healthy diet [172,173,174,175,176] and increasing physical activity [177,178,179,180] could delay the onset of AD.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stephen, R., Hongisto, K., Solomon, A., & Lönnroos, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2017-01-03
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
glw251
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2564512120
Cited by
262
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 6
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kuopio University Hospital
  • Academy of Finland (287490, 294061)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
physical activity, Alzheimer's disease, leisure-time physical activity, work-related physical activity, dementia risk, protective factors, exercise intervention, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Leisure Activities, Research Design, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review