Cited by 173Resilience and Mental HealthGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrailty in Older Adults

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Report: NIA Workshop on Measures of Physiologic Resiliencies in Human Aging

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Resilience, the ability to resist or recover from adverse effects of a stressor, is of widespread interest in social, psychologic, biologic, and medical research and particularly salient as the capacity to respond to stressors becomes diminished with aging. To date, research on human resilience responses to and factors influencing these responses has been limited. METHODS: The National Institute on Aging convened a workshop in August 2015 on needs for research to improve measures to predict and assess resilience in human aging. Effects of aging-related factors in impairing homeostatic responses were developed from examples illustrating multiple determinants of clinical resilience outcomes. Research directions were identified by workshop participants. RESULTS: Research needs identified included expanded uses of clinical data and specimens in predicting or assessing resilience, and contributions from epidemiological studies in identifying long-term predictors. Better measures, including simulation tests, are needed to assess resilience and its determinants. Mechanistic studies should include exploration of influences of biologic aging processes on human resiliencies. Important resource and infrastructure needs include consensus phenotype definitions of specific resiliencies, capacity to link epidemiological and clinical resilience data, sensor technology to capture responses to stressors, better laboratory animal models of human resiliencies, and new analytic methods to understand the effects of multiple determinants of stress responses. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the focus of care and research to improving the capacity to respond to stressors could benefit older adults in promoting a healthier life span.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glx015

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kuchel, 2017, Aging and homeostatic regulation, 1871

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hadley, E. C., Kuchel, G. A., Newman, A. B., Allore, H. G., Bartley, J. M., Bergeman, C. S., Blinov, M. L., Colon-Emeric, C. S., Dabhar, F. S., Dugan, L. L., Dutta, C., Eldadah, B. A., Ferrucci, L., Kirkland, J. L., Kritchevsky, S. B., Lipsitz, L. A., Nadkarni, N. K., Reed, M. J., Schmader, K. E., Sierra, F., Studenski, S. A., Varadhan, R., Walston, J. D., Whitson, H. E., & Yung, R.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Newman, Anne B
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
Published
2017-05-05
Volume
72
Issue
7
Pages
980-990
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2611341457
Cited by
173
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Michigan Library
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
resilience, human aging, stress response, homeostatic responses, older adults, biological aging, sensor technology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aging, Consensus Statements as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Stress, Psychological, Geriatric Assessment, Behavioral Research, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review