Cited by 43Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Measurement invariance of cognitive abilities across ethnicity, gender, and time among older Americans

Open access
Blankson, A. Nayena, McArdle, John J.·2015·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to test the invariance of the cognitive variables in the Health and Retirement Study/Asset Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old studies (HRS/AHEAD) across ethnicity, gender, and time. METHOD: Analyses were conducted using a selected subsample of the HRS/AHEAD data set. The cognitive performance tests measuring episodic memory and mental status were used, and invariance of a two-factor structure was tested using confirmatory factor analyses and multilevel modeling for longitudinal data. RESULTS: Results provided some support for "strict" factorial invariance of the episodic memory and mental status measures across ethnicity and gender. Further support of weak ("metric") measurement invariance was found across time. DISCUSSION: Results of the research further our understanding of invariance of the HRS/AHEAD cognitive ability measures. Further implications are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbt106

Cites

46 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A further nine usable studies were identified based on the search.

    “A further nine usable studies were identified based on the search (Blankson & McArdle, 2015;Dalliard, 2013;Fuerst et al., 2023;Hu, 2025;Kane, 2004Kane, , 2007;;Kane & Brand, 2008; National Academy of Sciences [NAS], 1921;Shibaev & Fuerst, 2026).”

    From A Meta-Analysis of Spearman’s Hypothesis in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as Blankson & McArdle, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodnessof-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling , 9 , 233-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/ S15328007SEM0902\_5
  2. Leacock, C. (Ed.). (2006). Getting started with the Health and Retirement Study, Version 1.0 . Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blankson, A. N., & McArdle, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Spelman College (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2013-10-29
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
386-397
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2150226755
Cited by
43
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R37AG007137, U01AG009740)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
measurement invariance, cognitive ability, older adults, episodic memory, mental status, ethnicity, gender differences, longitudinal change, oldest old, cognitive assessment validity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Black People, White People, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review