Cited by 111Aging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

The Role of Midlife Occupational Complexity and Leisure Activity in Late-Life Cognition

Andel, Ross, Silverstein, Merril, Kåreholt, Ingemar·2015·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether occupational complexity of working with data or people, and cognitive or social leisure activity at midlife predicted cognition in advanced old age. METHODS: We used 810 eligible participants from Longitudinal Study of Living Conditions of the Oldest Old, a Swedish nationally representative study of individuals aged 77+ with cognitive assessments (an abridged version of the Mini-Mental State Exam) administered in 1992 and 2002 and linked to information about their midlife occupation and leisure activities collected in 1968 and 1981. A bootstrapping technique was applied to examine the direct and interactive associations of occupational complexity and leisure activity with late-life cognition. RESULTS: Controlling for demographic and health-related factors from childhood, midlife, and late life, we found that greater work complexity, both with people and with data, and greater participation in cognitive or social leisure activities independently related to better late-life cognitive scores. The complexity-cognition link was moderated by leisure activity such that the cognitive benefit related to the complexity of work-especially complexity of working with people-was rendered insignificant when participation in leisure activities-especially social activities-was above average. DISCUSSION: Results are discussed in terms of using work complexity to compensate for lack of leisure activity as well as in terms of promoting leisure engagement to compensate for long-term cognitive disadvantage imposed by working in less challenging occupations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbu110

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andel, R., Silverstein, M., & Kåreholt, I.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2014-09-04
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
314-321
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2151635986
Cited by
111
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
FWCI
12.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
occupational complexity, leisure, late-life cognition, cognitive aging, oldest old, social leisure, working with people
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Occupations, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review