Cited by 679Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Mental Exercise and Mental Aging: Evaluating the Validity of the “Use It or Lose It” Hypothesis

Salthouse, Timothy A.·2006·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

It is widely believed that keeping mentally active will prevent age-related mental decline. The primary prediction of this mental-exercise hypothesis is that the rate of age-related decline in measures of cognitive functioning will be less pronounced for people who are more mentally active, or, equivalently, that the cognitive differences among people who vary in level of mental activity will be greater with increased age. Although many training studies, and comparisons involving experts, people in specific occupations, and people whose mental activity levels are determined by their self-reports, have found a positive relation between level of activity and level of cognitive functioning, very few studies have found an interactive effect of age and mental activity on measures of cognitive functioning. Despite the current lack of empirical evidence for the idea that the rate of mental aging is moderated by amount of mental activity, there may be personal benefits to assuming that the mental-exercise hypothesis is true.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00005.x

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salthouse, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Salthouse, Timothy A.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2006-03
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
68-87
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2164018083
Cited by
679
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 37
FWCI
32.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
mental exercise, cognitive aging, age-related cognitive decline, cognitive training, mental activity, cognitive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review