Cited by 45Workplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Workplace Exposures and Cognitive Function During Adulthood: Evidence From National Survey of Midlife Development and the O*NET

Open access
Grzywacz, Joseph G., Segel-Karpas, Dikla, Lachman, Margie E.·2016·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Expand understanding of the role of selected workplace exposures (ie, occupational complexity, conflict in the workplace, pace of work, and physical hazards) in adults' cognitive function. METHODS: Cross-sectional data (n = 1991) from the second wave of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study; restricted to participants who completed telephone-based cognitive assessments of episodic memory, executive functioning, and self-perceived memory. Occupational exposure data were harvested from the ONET Release 6.0. RESULTS: Greater complexity was associated with better self-perceived memory among women and men, and better episodic memory and executive functioning among women. Greater physical hazards were independently associated with poorer episodic memory and executive functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Objective assessments of physical and psychosocial exposures in the workplace are independently associated with cognitive outcomes in adulthood, with psychosocial exposures being particularly pronounced among women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0000000000000727

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having a mentally stimulating job and engaging in other mentally stimulating activities may also help build cognitive reserve.

    “Having a mentally stimulating job and engaging in other mentally stimulating activities may also help build cognitive reserve.[154][155][156][157]”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [154]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says occupational complexity may enhance adults’ cognitive reserve, supporting the mentally stimulating job portion. The paper does not establish that other mentally stimulating activities build cognitive reserve; a study of leisure activity appears in its References, but that title alone does not support the additional claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grzywacz, J. G., Segel-Karpas, D., & Lachman, M. E.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Grzywacz, Joseph G.
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2016-06
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
535-541
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2411106810
Cited by
45
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG020166, U19AG051426)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD061010, R01HD056360)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
occupational exposure, cognitive function, occupational complexity, workplace conflict, work pace, physical hazards, psychosocial stressors, episodic memory, executive function, sex differences, middle-aged adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Occupational Exposure, Workplace, Executive Function, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review