Cited by 60Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Well-being in older Mexican American spouses

Peek, M. Kristen, Stimpson, Jim P., Townsend, Aloen L., Markides, Kyriakos S.·2006·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a strong connection between marriage and well-being, with evidence suggesting that the well-being of one spouse is closely correlated with that of the other. However, among older Mexican Americans, there is little information about this phenomenon. To address this, we explore two research questions: Does one spouse's well-being predict the other spouse's well-being? Are there gender differences in these effects? DESIGN AND METHODS: We assess information from 553 couples who participated in Wave 1 (1993-1994) of the Hispanic Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. Using structural equation models, we examined three aspects of well-being among older Mexican American couples: depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, and self-rated health. RESULTS: The findings revealed evidence of an association between the well-being of one spouse and that of the other. Specifically, the self-rated health of husbands and wives predicts that of their partners. However, there is evidence that husbands' depressive symptoms and life satisfaction influence wives' well-being, but not the reverse. IMPLICATIONS: The findings from this study are important because they add to the literature on the connection of well-being among spouses, point to important gender differences, focus on an understudied minority group with unique cultural characteristics, and have implications for the examination of well-being within a marriage framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/46.2.258

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peek, M. K., Stimpson, J. P., Townsend, A. L., & Markides, K. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Peek, M. Kristen
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2006-04
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
258-265
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2096925384
Cited by
60
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50ca105631-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG21098, R01AG10939, R01AG010939)
  • National Cancer Institute (5P50CA105631)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
marital well-being, older Mexican Americans, spousal influence, gender differences, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, self-rated health, couples
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Marriage, Personal Satisfaction, United States, Mexican Americans, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review