Cited by 29Aging and Gerontology ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging, Health, and Disability

Subjective well-being dynamics in couples from the Australian longitudinal study of aging

Walker, Ruth, Luszcz, Mary, Gerstorf, Denis, Hoppmann, Christiane·2011·Gerontology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence for spousal associations in late-life development among key functional domains. Spousal interrelations in subjective well-being (SWB) have primarily been discussed in the context of a model of 'transmission', an indicator of well-being. Typically, depression is used to mark this, but few studies have examined if such transmission can be found over the long term in older couples' SWB. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether longitudinal dyadic interrelations exist among older couples in the SWB domain, as indicated by morale. METHODS: We applied dynamic models to 11-year longitudinal data of 316 couples from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging (median age = 75 years at baseline) to explore whether the levels of SWB for one partner predict change in SWB for the other. RESULTS: Spousal interrelations emerged and were found to be gender-specific with wives predicting subsequent change among husbands, but not the reverse pattern of influence. Husbands whose wives reported higher initial SWB showed a relatively shallower decline over time relative to husbands whose wives reported lower initial SWB levels. These associations were robust after covarying for differences in age, education, health and marital characteristics (number of children and length of marriage). CONCLUSION: Our study is consistent with, and illustrates empirically that close relationships shape individual developmental outcomes. The findings suggest that wives play an important role in setting the affective tone in older couples. We discuss possible factors underlying such interrelations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000318633

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, R., Luszcz, M., Gerstorf, D., & Hoppmann, C.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010-07-08
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
153-160
ISSN
  • 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0003
OpenAlex
W2005369913
Cited by
29
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
subjective well-being, older couples, spousal transmission, morale, late-life development, gender differences, spousal influence, emotional tone, marital relationships
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Australia, Depression, Family Health, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review