Cited by 450Technology Use by Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Patterns of Technology Use Among Older Adults With and Without Disabilities

Open access
Gell, Nancy M., Rosenberg, Dori E., Demiris, George, LaCroix, Andrea Z., Patel, Kushang V.·2015·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to describe prevalence of technology use among adults ages 65 and older, particularly for those with disability and activity-limiting symptoms and impairments. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (N = 7,609), were analyzed. Analysis consisted of technology use (use of e-mail/text messages and the internet) by sociodemographic and health characteristics and prevalence ratios for technology usage by disability status. RESULTS: Forty percent of older adults used e-mail or text messaging and 42.7% used the internet. Higher prevalence of technology use was associated with younger age, male sex, white race, higher education level, and being married (all p values <.001). After adjustment for sociodemographic and health characteristics, technology use decreased significantly with greater limitations in physical capacity and greater disability. Vision impairment and memory limitations were also associated with lower likelihood of technology use. IMPLICATIONS: Technology usage in U.S. older adults varied significantly by sociodemographic and health status. Prevalence of technology use differed by the type of disability and activity-limiting impairments. The internet, e-mail, and text messaging might be viable mediums for health promotion and communication, particularly for younger cohorts of older adults and those with certain types of impairment and less severe disability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnt166

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gell, N. M., Rosenberg, D. E., Demiris, G., LaCroix, A. Z., & Patel, K. V.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Gell, Nancy M.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2013-12-30
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
412-421
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2114661329
Cited by
450
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 6
FWCI
40.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Health and Aging Trends Study (U01AG32947)
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG027677, NIA U01AG32947, U01AG032947)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
technology use, older adults, disability, internet use, email, text messaging, visual impairment, memory constraints, physical capacity, sociodemographic differences, health communication, health promotion
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attitude to Computers, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Technology, Prevalence, Internet, Electronic Mail, White People, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review