Cited by 129Hospital Admissions and OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence-Based Interventions for Transitions in Care for Individuals Living With Dementia

Hirschman, Karen B, Hodgson, Nancy A·2018·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Despite numerous, often predictable, transitions in care, little is known about the core elements of successful transitions in care specifically for persons with dementia. The paper examines available evidence-based interventions to improve the care transitions for persons with dementia and their caregivers. Research Design and Methods: A state-of-the-art review was conducted for research published on interventions targeting transitions in care for persons living with dementia and their caregivers through January 2017. Results: Our review revealed seven evidence-based interventions to postpone/prevent or reduce care transitions specific to persons living with dementia. Effective approaches appear to be those that involve the individual and caregiver in establishing goals of care, educate the individual and caregiver about likely transitions in care; provide timely communication of information about the individual, create strong inter professional teams with competencies in dementia care, and implement evidence-based models of practice. Discussion and Implications: Five essential features for consistent and supported care transitions for persons with dementia and their caregivers are recommended. Findings reinforce the need for additional research and adaptation of evidence-based transitions in care interventions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnx152

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Alzheimer’s Association, 2017, Policy brief: Reducing potentially preventable hospitalizations for people living with Alzheimer’s and other dementias
  2. American Medical Directors Association (AMDA), 2010, Transitions of care in the long-term care continuum clinical practice guidelines, 1
  3. 2015, Training to serve people with dementia: Is our health care system ready? Paper 2: A review of dementia training standards across health care settings

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Hirschman, K. B., & Hodgson, N. A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Hirschman, Karen B
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2018-01-18
Volume
58
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
S129-S140
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2790474892
Cited by
129
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer’s Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
dementia, care transitions, evidence-based interventions, caregivers, goals of care, multidisciplinary team, practice models, person-centred care
MeSH terms
Aged, Continuity of Patient Care, Dementia, Humans, Patient Transfer, Social Support, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review