Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research

Open access
Warr, Amanda, Affara, Nabeel, Aken, Bronwen, Beiki, Hamid, Bickhart, Derek M, Billis, Konstantinos, Chow, William, Eory, Lel, Finlayson, Heather A, Flicek, Paul, Girón, Carlos G, Griffin, Darren K, Hall, Richard, Hannum, Greg, Hourlier, Thibaut, Howe, Kerstin, Hume, David A, Izuogu, Osagie, Kim, Kristi, Koren, Sergey, Liu, Haibou, Manchanda, Nancy, Martin, Fergal J, Nonneman, Dan J, O'Connor, Rebecca E, Phillippy, Adam M, Rohrer, Gary A, Rosen, Benjamin D, Rund, Laurie A, Sargent, Carole A, Schook, Lawrence B, Schroeder, Steven G, Schwartz, Ariel S, Skinner, Ben M, Talbot, Richard, Tseng, Elizabeth, Tuggle, Christopher K, Watson, Mick, Smith, Timothy P L, Archibald, Alan L·2020·GigaScience

Abstract

Background: The domestic pig (Sus scrofa) is important both as a food source and as a biomedical model given its similarity in size, anatomy, physiology, metabolism, pathology, and pharmacology to humans. The draft reference genome (Sscrofa10.2) of a purebred Duroc female pig established using older clone-based sequencing methods was incomplete, and unresolved redundancies, short-range order and orientation errors, and associated misassembled genes limited its utility. Results: We present 2 annotated highly contiguous chromosome-level genome assemblies created with more recent long-read technologies and a whole-genome shotgun strategy, 1 for the same Duroc female (Sscrofa11.1) and 1 for an outbred, composite-breed male (USMARCv1.0). Both assemblies are of substantially higher (>90-fold) continuity and accuracy than Sscrofa10.2. Conclusions: These highly contiguous assemblies plus annotation of a further 11 short-read assemblies provide an unprecedented view of the genetic make-up of this important agricultural and biomedical model species. We propose that the improved Duroc assembly (Sscrofa11.1) become the reference genome for genomic research in pigs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gigascience/giaa051

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Warr, A., Affara, N., Aken, B., Beiki, H., Bickhart, D. M., Billis, K., Chow, W., Eory, L., Finlayson, H. A., Flicek, P., Girón, C. G., Griffin, D. K., Hall, R., Hannum, G., Hourlier, T., Howe, K., Hume, D. A., Izuogu, O., Kim, K., Koren, S., Liu, H., Manchanda, N., Martin, F. J., Nonneman, D. J., O'Connor, R. E., Phillippy, A. M., Rohrer, G. A., Rosen, B. D., Rund, L. A., Sargent, C. A., Schook, L. B., Schroeder, S. G., Schwartz, A. S., Skinner, B. M., Talbot, R., Tseng, E., Tuggle, C. K., Watson, M., Smith, T. P. L., & Archibald, A. L.
Venue
GigaScience
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
9
Issue
6
ISSN
2047-217X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034696123
Cited by
431
References
77
FWCI
16.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gigascience/giaa051
The paper
Warr, A., Affara, N., Aken, B., Beiki, H., Bickhart, D. M., Billis, K., Chow, W., Eory, L., Finlayson, H. A., Flicek, P., Girón, C. G., Griffin, D. K., Hall, R., Hannum, G., Hourlier, T., Howe, K., Hume, D. A., Izuogu, O., Kim, K., . . . Archibald, A. L. (2020). An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research. GigaScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.