Cited by 39Digital Mental Health InterventionsWorkplace Health and Well-beingMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Factors associated with high use of a workplace web-based stress management program in a randomized controlled intervention study

Hasson, H., Brown, C., Hasson, D.·2010·Health Education Research

Abstract

In web-based health promotion programs, large variations in participant engagement are common. The aim was to investigate determinants of high use of a worksite self-help web-based program for stress management. Two versions of the program were offered to randomly selected departments in IT and media companies. A static version of the program including health screening tool, diary and information about stress was offered to the control group. Additional materials, i.e. interactive, cognitive-based and classical stress management exercises and a chat room, were offered to the intervention group. Baseline data regarding participants' demographics, health (self-ratings and biological measures), lifestyle, work-related factors and group membership were analyzed to study determinants of employees' participation in the program during a period of 12 months. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used and found intervention group membership, being a woman, having at most a secondary education, regular physical exercise habits and having positive expectations of the program were significant predictors of high use. The findings demonstrate that the interactivity of a web-based program is an important factor for determining participation in a web-based worksite stress management program. Implications for those developing and implementing future web-based health promotion activities are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyq005

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study on a web-based stress intervention found no differences among baseline stress levels, implying that those with health issues also participated.

    “Similar results were reported in a study on a web-based stress intervention, which found no differences among baseline stress levels, implying that those with health issues also participated [68].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasson, H., Brown, C., & Hasson, D.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Hasson, H.
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2010-02-11
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
596-607
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2141522503
Cited by
39
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
workplace health promotion, participant engagement, self-help intervention, gender differences, educational attainment, physical activity, program expectations, occupational stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Workplace, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review