Cited by 216Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Reach, Engagement, and Retention in an Internet-Based Weight Loss Program in a Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Glasgow, Russell E, Nelson, Candace C, Kearney, Kathleen A, Reid, Robert, Ritzwoller, Debra P, Strecher, Victor J, Couper, Mick P, Green, Beverly +1 more·2007·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research increasingly supports the conclusion that well-designed programs delivered over the Internet can produce significant weight loss compared to randomized controlled conditions. Much less is known about four important issues addressed in this study: (1) which recruitment methods produce higher eHealth participation rates, (2) which patient characteristics are related to enrollment, (3) which characteristics are related to level of user engagement in the program, and (4) which characteristics are related to continued participation in project assessments. METHODS: We recruited overweight members of three health maintenance organizations (HMOs) to participate in an entirely Internet-mediated weight loss program developed by HealthMedia, Inc. Two different recruitment methods were used: personal letters from prevention directors in each HMO, and general notices in member newsletters. The personal letters were sent to members diagnosed with diabetes or heart disease and, in one HMO, to a general membership sample in a particular geographic location. Data were collected in the context of a 2x2 randomized controlled trial, with participants assigned to receive or not receive a goal setting intervention and a nutrition education intervention in addition to the basic program. RESULTS: A total of 2311 members enrolled. Bivariate analyses on aggregate data revealed that personalized mailings produced higher enrollment rates than member newsletters and that members with diabetes or heart disease were more likely to enroll than those without these diagnoses. In addition, males, those over age 60, smokers, and those estimated to have higher medical expenses were less likely to enroll (all P < .001). Males and those in the combined intervention were less likely to engage initially, or to continue to be engaged with their Web program, than other participants. In terms of retention, multiple logistic regressions revealed that enrollees under age 60 (P < .001) and those with higher baseline self-efficacy were less likely to participate in the 12-month follow-up (P = .03), but with these exceptions, those participating were very similar to those not participating in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A single personalized mailing increases enrollment in Internet-based weight loss. eHealth programs offer great potential for recruiting large numbers of participants, but they may not reach those at highest risk. Patient characteristics related to each of these important factors may be different, and more comprehensive analyses of determinants of enrollment, engagement, and retention in eHealth programs are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e11

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Couper MP Peytchev A Rothert K Little RJA Combining information from multiple modes to evaluate and reduce nonresponse bias Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section 2005 Alexandria, VA American Statistical Association

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glasgow, R. E., Nelson, C. C., Kearney, K. A., Reid, R., Ritzwoller, D. P., Strecher, V. J., Couper, M. P., Green, B., & Wildenhaus, K.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • HealthMedia (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Glasgow, Russell E
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2007-05-09
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
e11
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125151323
Cited by
216
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
27.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
e-health, recruitment strategies, program enrollment, user engagement, participant retention, health maintenance organizations, overweight, goal-setting intervention, nutrition education, self-efficacy, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, patient characteristics
MeSH terms
Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Weight Loss, Logistic Models, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review