Cited by 30Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsWorkplace Health and Well-beingDigital Mental Health Interventions

Effect of a brief training program based on cognitive behavioral therapy in improving work performance: A randomized controlled trial

Kimura, Risa, Mori, Makiko, Tajima, Miyuki, Somemura, Hironori, Sasaki, Norio, Yamamoto, Megumi, Nakamura, Saki, Okanoya, June +3 more·2015·Journal of Occupational Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Efforts to improve performance in the workplace with respect to positive mental health have increased, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has recently attracted attention as an intervention measure to this end. Here, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief training program on CBT for improving work performance of employees. METHODS: The participants were employees of an electric company in Japan. The intervention consisted of 1 group session of CBT (120 min) and web-based CBT homework for 1 month. We evaluated employees in both the intervention and control groups at baseline and follow-up after three months. The main outcome was work performance, which was evaluated by a subjective score from 1 to 10. The secondary outcome was self-evaluation of cognitive flexibility. Analyses were conducted based on ITT. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 84 participants attended the group session, with 79 subsequently completing at least 1 instance of online homework. ITT analysis showed that the subjective performance of the intervention group was significantly improved compared with that of the control group (1.47 vs. 0.69, mean difference 0.78 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.05 to 1.51], Cohen's d=0.31). The ability to recognize dysfunctional thinking patterns and change them to positive ones significantly improved in the intervention group compared to the control group (0.71 vs. 0.26, mean difference 0.45 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.83], d=0.33). However, after adjustment for baseline scores, no significant difference was observed. The ability to view a situation from multiple perspectives and expand one's repertoire of thought patterns in the intervention group also significantly improved (0.83 vs. 0.35, mean difference 0.48 [95% CI 0.35 to 0.95], d=0.29), but here again, significance was lost after adjusting for baseline scores. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that a brief training program that combines a group CBT session with web-based CBT homework improved subjective work performance. In addition, this program might help improve employees' cognitive flexibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1539/joh.14-0208-oa

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kimura et al.'s blended CBT program had no significant change following adjustment for baseline scores on two secondary outcomes of cognitive flexibility.

    “The program produced a small significant increase in subjective work performance 3 months postintervention versus controls (d = 0.31) although there is no significant change following adjustment for baseline scores on two secondary outcomes of cognitive flexibility.”
  • Kimura et al.'s blended CBT program with 215 private sector workers produced a small significant increase in subjective work performance 3 months postintervention versus controls (d = 0.31).

    “The program produced a small significant increase in subjective work performance 3 months postintervention versus controls (d = 0.31) although there is no significant change following adjustment for baseline scores on two secondary outcomes of cognitive flexibility.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimura, R., Mori, M., Tajima, M., Somemura, H., Sasaki, N., Yamamoto, M., Nakamura, S., Okanoya, J., Ito, Y., Otsubo, T., & Tanaka, K.
Affiliations
  • Kitasato University (JP)
  • National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research Japan
  • Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Kimura, Risa
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health
Published
2015-03
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
169-178
ISSN
  • 1341-9145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-9585
OpenAlex
W2042328723
Cited by
30
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, employee performance, workers, web-based homework, group sessions, cognitive flexibility, workplace mental health
MeSH terms
Work Performance, Adult, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Staff Development, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Occupational Health, Self Report, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review