Cited by 275Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersWilliams Syndrome Research

Discovery and genetic localization of down syndrome cerebellar phenotypes using the Ts65Dn mouse

Baxter, L. L.·2000·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of mental retardation and affects many aspects of brain development. DS individuals exhibit an overall reduction in brain size with a disproportionately greater reduction in cerebellar volume. The Ts65Dn mouse is segmentally trisomic for the distal 12-15 Mb of mouse chromosome 16, a region that shows perfect conserved linkage with human chromosome 21, and therefore provides a genetic model for DS. In this study, high resolution magnetic resonance imaging and histological analysis demonstrate precise neuro- anatomical parallels between the DS and the Ts65Dn cerebellum. Cerebellar volume is significantly reduced in Ts65Dn mice due to reduction of both the internal granule layer and the molecular layer of the cerebellum. Granule cell number is further reduced by a decrease in cell density in the internal granule layer. Despite these changes in Ts65Dn cerebellar structure, motor deficits have not been detected in several tests. Reduction in granule cell density in Ts65Dn mice correctly predicts an analogous pathology in humans; a significant reduction in granule cell density in the DS cerebellum is reported here for the first time. The candidate region of genes on chromosome 21 affecting cerebellar development in DS is therefore delimited to the subset of genes whose orthologs are at dosage imbalance in Ts65Dn mice, providing the first localization of genes affecting a neuroanatomical phenotype in DS. The application of this mod…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/9.2.195

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ts65Dn mice exhibit deficient neurological structural phenotypes in brain regions where the current study found DYRK1A overexpression, including during perinatal or early postnatal ages.

    “Ts65Dn mice do exhibit deficient neurological structural phenotypes in brain regions where we found DYRK1A overexpression including during perinatal or early postnatal ages (Baxter et al., 2000; Belichenko et al., 2004; Bianchi et al., 2010; Chakrabarti et al., 2007; Roper et al., 2006b; Stagni et al., 2016).”
  • Similar to human studies, neuronal hypocellularity has been detected in multiple structures including the cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus in postnatal trisomic Ts65Dn animals.

    “Similar to human studies, neuronal hypocellularity has been detected in multiple structures including the cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus in postnatal trisomic animals (Insausti et al., 1998; Baxter et al., 2000; Olson et al., 2004; Roper et al., 2006; Chakrabarti et al., 2010; Aziz et al., 2018).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Baxter et al., 2000

  • Unlike humans, this hypocellularity does not appear to be driving persistent volumetric changes in these structures, as size deficits detected prenatally do not persist postnatally except in the cerebellum.

    “However, unlike humans, this hypocellularity does not appear to be driving persistent volumetric changes in these structures, as size deficits detected prenatally (Chakrabarti et al., 2007) do not persist postnatally except in the cerebellum (Baxter et al., 2000; Olson et al., 2004).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Baxter et al., 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baxter, L. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Baxter, L. L.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2000-01-22
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
195-202
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2149852014
Cited by
275
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG005146, AG 05146)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-24605, P01HD024605)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
Down syndrome, Ts65Dn mouse model, trisomy 16, chromosome 21, cerebellum, cerebellar volume, molecular layer, cerebellar development, neuroanatomical phenotypes, gene mapping, intellectual disability
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Cerebellum, Crosses, Genetic, Down Syndrome, Female, Genetic Markers, Granulocytes, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mice, Inbred A, Mice, Inbred CBA, Mice, Inbred C3H, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review