Cited by 851Smoking Behavior and CessationGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cholinergic nicotinic receptor genes implicated in a nicotine dependence association study targeting 348 candidate genes with 3713 SNPs

Open access

Abstract

Nicotine dependence is one of the world's leading causes of preventable death. To discover genetic variants that influence risk for nicotine dependence, we targeted over 300 candidate genes and analyzed 3713 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 1050 cases and 879 controls. The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence (FTND) was used to assess dependence, in which cases were required to have an FTND of 4 or more. The control criterion was strict: control subjects must have smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetimes and had an FTND of 0 during the heaviest period of smoking. After correcting for multiple testing by controlling the false discovery rate, several cholinergic nicotinic receptor genes dominated the top signals. The strongest association was from an SNP representing CHRNB3, the beta3 nicotinic receptor subunit gene (P = 9.4 x 10(-5)). Biologically, the most compelling evidence for a risk variant came from a non-synonymous SNP in the alpha5 nicotinic receptor subunit gene CHRNA5 (P = 6.4 x 10(-4)). This SNP exhibited evidence of a recessive mode of inheritance, resulting in individuals having a 2-fold increase in risk of developing nicotine dependence once exposed to cigarette smoking. Other genes among the top signals were KCNJ6 and GABRA4. This study represents one of the most powerful and extensive studies of nicotine dependence to date and has found novel risk loci that require confirmation by replication studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddl438

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tapper, 2006, Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and nicotine dependence

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 851

Metadata

Authors
Saccone, S. F., Hinrichs, A. L., Saccone, N. L., Chase, G. A., Konvicka, K., Madden, P. A. F., Breslau, N., Johnson, E. O., Hatsukami, D., Pomerleau, O., Swan, G. E., Goate, A. M., Rutter, J., Bertelsen, S., Fox, L., Fugman, D., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., Wang, J. C., Ballinger, D. G., Rice, J. P., & Bierut, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Perlegen (United States) (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • SRI International (US)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Saccone, Scott F.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2006-11-29
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
36-49
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2118320202
Cited by
850
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 86
FWCI
31.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R56DA012854, DA12854, DA015129, N01DA07079, K01DA015129, R01DA012854)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA89392, P01CA089392)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
nicotine dependence, CHRNA5, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genetic association, genetic susceptibility loci, recessive inheritance, KCNJ6, GABRA4, smoking, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8, Female, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Receptors, Nicotinic, Tobacco Use Disorder, Genetic Variation, Cluster Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review