Genomic and functional profiling of human Down syndrome neural progenitors implicates S100B and aquaporin 4 in cell injury
Abstract
Down syndrome (DS) is caused by trisomy of chromosome 21 and is characterized by mental retardation, seizures and premature Alzheimer's disease. To examine neuropathological mechanisms giving rise to this disorder, we generated multiple human DS neural progenitor cell (NPC) lines from the 19-21 week frontal cortex and characterized their genomic and functional properties. Microarray profiling of DS progenitors indicated that increased levels of gene expression were not limited to chromosome 21, suggesting that increased expression of genes on chromosome 21 altered transcriptional regulation of a subset of genes throughout the entire genome. Moreover, many transcriptionally dysregulated genes were involved in cell death and oxidative stress. Network analyses suggested that upregulated expression of chromosome 21 genes such as S100B and amyloid precursor protein activated the stress response kinase pathways, and furthermore, could be linked to upregulation of the water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4). We further demonstrate in DS NPCs that S100B is constitutively overexpressed, that overexpression leads to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and activation of stress response kinases, and that activation of this pathway results in compensatory AQP4 expression. In addition, AQP4 expression could be induced by direct exposure to ROS, and siRNA inhibition of AQP4 resulted in elevated levels of ROS following S100B exposure. Finally, elevated levels of S100B-induced ROS and loss of AQP4 expression led to increased programmed cell death. These findings suggest that dysregulation of chromosome 21 genes in DS neural progenitors leads to increased ROS and thereby alters transcriptional regulation of cytoprotective, non-chromosome 21 genes in response to ongoing cellular insults.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neurospheres derived from individuals with Down syndrome expand more slowly than those from controls, suggesting that they contain fewer proliferating progenitor cells.
“Neurospheres derived from individuals with DS expand more slowly than those from controls, suggesting that they contain fewer proliferating progenitor cells.”
From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
In “Characterization of human DS NPCs” (page unavailable), the paper reports that Down syndrome neurospheres appeared to proliferate more slowly than controls shortly after dissociation. It does not establish that they contained fewer proliferating progenitor cells; the same section says the Down syndrome cells generally showed increased proliferation with serial passaging. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain
Doetsch, F., Caillé, I., Lim, D. A., García-Verdugo, J. M., & Alvarez-Buylla, A. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80783-7 · Cited by 3,898 · see citing works
Dendritic atrophy in children with down’s syndrome.
Becker, L. E., Armstrong, D. L., & Chan, F. (1986) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410200413 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Down's syndrome: Is there a decreased population of neurons?
Ross, M. H., Galaburda, A. M., & Kemper, T. L. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.909 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Primary and secondary transcriptional effects in the developing human down syndrome brain and heart
Mao, R., Wang, X., Spitznagel, E. L., Frelin, L. P., Ting, J. C., Ding, H., Kim, J.-W., Ruczinski, I., Downey, T. J., & Pevsner, J. (2005) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-13-r107 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- D'Amour, K.A. and Gage, F.H. (2003) Genetic and functional differences between multipotent neural and pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100 (Suppl. 1), 11866-11872.
- Reeves, R.H., Yao, J., Crowley, M.R., Buck, S., Zhang, X., Yarowsky, P., Gearhart, J.D. and Hilt, D.C. (1994) Astrocytosis and axonal proliferation in the hippocampus of S100b transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 5359-5363.
- Pearson, G., Robinson, F., Beers Gibson, T., Xu, B.E., Karandikar, M., Berman, K. and Cobb, M.H. (2001) Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: regulation and physiological functions. Endocr. Rev, 22, 153-183.
- Tusher, V.G., Tibshirani, R. and Chu, G. (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5116-5121.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HMGB1, IL-1α, IL-33 and S100 proteins: dual-function alarmins
Bertheloot, D., & Latz, E. (2017) · Cellular & Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/cmi.2016.34 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Chen, C., Jiang, P., Xue, H., Peterson, S. E., Tran, H. T., McCann, A. E., Parast, M. M., Li, S., Pleasure, D. E., Laurent, L. C., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5430 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Duchon, A., & Herault, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00104 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Hibaoui, Y., Grad, I., Letourneau, A., Sailani, M. R., Dahoun, S., Santoni, F. A., Gimelli, S., Guipponi, M., Pelte, M. F., Béna, F., et al. (2014) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.201302848 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Communication breaks-Down: From neurodevelopment defects to cognitive disabilities in Down syndrome
Contestabile, A., Benfenati, F., & Gasparini, L. (2010) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.01.003 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Wu, S., Xu, R., Duan, B., & Jiang, P. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c7tb00721c · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Mizuno, G. O., Wang, Y., Shi, G., Wang, Y., Sun, J., Papadopoulos, S., Broussard, G. J., Unger, E. K., Deng, W., Weick, J., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.033 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Antioxidants in Down Syndrome: From Preclinical Studies to Clinical Trials
Rueda Revilla, N., & Martínez-Cué, C. (2020) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox9080692 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome
Russo, M. L., Sousa, A. M. M., & Bhattacharyya, A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-024-00866-2 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“For example, human neural progenitor cells (hNPCs) derived from fetal cortical tissue from individuals with DS can be cultured in suspension as neurospheres , the growth of which is correlated with NPC proliferation 66–69 .”
- Authors
- Esposito, G., Imitola, J., Lu, J., De Filippis, D., Scuderi, C., Ganesh, V. S., Folkerth, R., Hecht, J., Shin, S., Iuvone, T., Chesnut, J., Steardo, L., & Sheen, V.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Sheen, Volney
- ORCID
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-11-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 440-457
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2104401594
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD054347)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, neural progenitor cells, S100B, aquaporin-4, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, programmed cell death, transcriptional dysregulation, amyloid precursor protein, frontal cortex, cell damage
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Cell Line, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21, Down Syndrome, Humans, Nerve Growth Factors, S100 Proteins, Neurons, Transfection, Case-Control Studies, Apoptosis, Reactive Oxygen Species, DNA Primers, Oxidative Stress, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA, Small Interfering, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Aquaporin 4, Embryonic Stem Cells, S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review