Cited by 275Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The ER stress factor XBP1s prevents amyloid-β neurotoxicity

Open access
Casas-Tinto, Sergio, Zhang, Yan, Sanchez-Garcia, Jonatan, Gomez-Velazquez, Melisa, Rincon-Limas, Diego E., Fernandez-Funez, Pedro·2011·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an incurable neurodegenerative disorder clinically characterized by progressive cognitive impairment. A prominent pathologic hallmark in the AD brain is the abnormal accumulation of the amyloid-β 1-42 peptide (Aβ), but the exact pathways mediating Aβ neurotoxicity remain enigmatic. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is induced during AD, and has been indirectly implicated as a mediator of Aβ neurotoxicity. We report here that Aβ activates the ER stress response factor X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) in transgenic flies and in mammalian cultured neurons, yielding its active form, the transcription factor XBP1s. XBP1s shows neuroprotective activity in two different AD models, flies expressing Aβ and mammalian cultured neurons treated with Aβ oligomers. Trying to identify the mechanisms mediating XBP1s neuroprotection, we found that in PC12 cells treated with Aβ oligomers, XBP1s prevents the accumulation of free calcium (Ca(2+)) in the cytosol. This protective activity can be mediated by the downregulation of a specific isoform of the ryanodine Ca(2+) channel, RyR3. In support of this observation, a mutation in the only ryanodine receptor (RyR) in flies also suppresses Aβ neurotoxicity, indicating the conserved mechanisms between the two AD models. These results underscore the functional relevance of XBP1s in Aβ toxicity, and uncover the potential of XBP1 and RyR as targets for AD therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddr100

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Aβ42 eye produces a very rough and small eye, with increased roughness and ommatidial fusion toward the posterior.

    “The Aβ42 eye produces a very rough and small eye, with increased roughness and ommatidial fusion toward the posterior of the eye (Fig. 8C; 89).”

    From Functional genomic screen and network analysis reveal novel modifiers of tauopathy dissociated from tau phosphorylation (2011) · cites this paper as [89]

    In “Generation of a new AD model in flies” and the Figure 1 caption (page not provided), the paper describes Aβ42-expressing eyes as small and highly disorganized, supporting the small, rough-eye description. It does not report increasing roughness or ommatidial fusion toward the posterior of the eye. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Expression of Aβ42 and TDP-43Q331K in the fly eye driven by GMR-GAL4 leads to eye phenotypes.

    “Similar to tau and to polyglutamine proteins, expression of Aβ42 and TDP-43Q331K in the fly eye driven by GMR-GAL4 leads to eye phenotypes.”

    From Functional genomic screen and network analysis reveal novel modifiers of tauopathy dissociated from tau phosphorylation (2011) · cites this paper as [89]

    The “Generation of a new AD model in flies” section reports that Aβ42 expression with gmr-Gal4 produced small, disorganized eyes with necrotic spots. The cited paper does not report an eye phenotype for TDP-43Q331K, so it supports only the Aβ42 part of the claim. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Lee, A.H., Iwakoshi, N.N., Anderson, K.C. and Glimcher, L.H. (2003) Proteasome inhibitors disrupt the unfolded protein response in myeloma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 9946-9951.
  2. Fernandez-Funez, P., Salinas, J., Nino-Rosales, L. and Rincon-Limas, D.E. (2007) In Hanin, I., Windisch, M., Poewe, W. and Fisher, A. (eds), New Trends in Alzheimer and Parkinson Disorders: ADPD 2007. Medimont, Salzburg, Austria, pp. 37-41.
  3. Sullivan, K.M., Scott, K., Zuker, C.S. and Rubin, G.M. (2000) The ryanodine receptor is essential for larval development in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 5942-5947.
  4. Kikuchi, H., Almer, G., Yamashita, S., Guegan, C., Nagai, M., Xu, Z., Sosunov, A.A., McKhann, G.M. 2nd and Przedborski, S. (2006) Spinal cord endoplasmic reticulum stress associated with a microsomal accumulation of mutant superoxide dismutase-1 in an ALS model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 6025-6030.
  5. Hetz, C., Lee, A.H., Gonzalez-Romero, D., Thielen, P., Castilla, J., Soto, C. and Glimcher, L.H. (2008) Unfolded protein response transcription factor XBP-1 does not influence prion replication or pathogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 757-762.
  6. Kang, M.J. and Ryoo, H.D. (2009) Suppression of retinal degeneration in Drosophila by stimulation of ER-associated degradation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 17043-17048.
  7. Fernandez-Funez, P., Nino-Rosales, M.L., de Gouyon, B., She, W.C., Luchak, J.M., Martinez, P., Turiegano, E., Benito, J., Capovilla, M., Skinner, P.J. et al. (2000) Identification of genes that modify ataxin-1-induced neurodegeneration. Nature, 408, 101-106. 2160 Human Molecular Genetics, 2011, Vol. 20, No. 11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casas-Tinto, S., Zhang, Y., Sanchez-Garcia, J., Gomez-Velazquez, M., Rincon-Limas, D. E., & Fernandez-Funez, P.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2011-03-09
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
2144-2160
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2103795148
Cited by
275
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DP2OD002721, DP2 OD002721-0)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
XBP1, endoplasmic reticulum stress, amyloid-beta toxicity, Alzheimer's disease, calcium homeostasis, intracellular calcium, neuroprotection, amyloid-beta oligomers, Drosophila model, PC12 cells, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Calcium, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Eye, Female, Male, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, RNA Splicing, Transfection, Amyloid beta-Peptides, PC12 Cells, Protein Folding, Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, RNA, Small Interfering, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review