Cited by 63Mitochondrial Function and PathologyEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Reduction of endoplasmic reticulum stress attenuates the defects caused by Drosophila mitofusin depletion

Open access
Debattisti, Valentina, Pendin, Diana, Ziviani, Elena, Daga, Andrea, Scorrano, Luca·2014·Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Ablation of the mitochondrial fusion and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–tethering protein Mfn2 causes ER stress, but whether this is just an epiphenomenon of mitochondrial dysfunction or a contributor to the phenotypes in mitofusin (Mfn)-depleted Drosophila melanogaster is unclear. In this paper, we show that reduction of ER dysfunction ameliorates the functional and developmental defects of flies lacking the single Mfn mitochondrial assembly regulatory factor (Marf). Ubiquitous or neuron- and muscle-specific Marf ablation was lethal, altering mitochondrial and ER morphology and triggering ER stress that was conversely absent in flies lacking the fusion protein optic atrophy 1. Expression of Mfn2 and ER stress reduction in flies lacking Marf corrected ER shape, attenuating the developmental and motor defects. Thus, ER stress is a targetable pathogenetic component of the phenotypes caused by Drosophila Mfn ablation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.201306121

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Debattisti, V., Pendin, D., Ziviani, E., Daga, A., & Scorrano, L.
Affiliations
  • Veneto Institute of Molecular Medicine (IT)
  • IRCCS Eugenio Medea (IT)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Scorrano, Luca
Venue
Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2014-01-27
Volume
204
Issue
3
Pages
303-312
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2077906609
Cited by
63
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitofusins, mitofusin 2, Marf, mitochondrial fusion, optic atrophy 1, ER morphology, motor defects, developmental defects, Drosophila melanogaster
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Genetic Complementation Test, Humans, Locomotion, Membrane Proteins, Mitochondria, Phenylbutyrates, Taurochenodeoxycholic Acid, Drosophila Proteins, RNA Interference, Mice, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review