Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adenomyosis in endometriosis – prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging

Open access
Bazot, Marc, Fiori, Olivia, Darai, Emile·2006·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Sir, We read with great interest the paper by Kunz et al. entitled ‘Adenomyosis in endometriosis – prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging’ (Kunz et al., 2005). The authors found a higher incidence of uterine adenomyosis in women with endometriosis than in women without endometriosis and suggested that adenomyosis could be a determinant of infertility (Kunz et al., 2005). However, this article raises issues concerning the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol used to diagnose adenomyosis. Concerning the imaging technique itself, the authors directly adopted a protocol used in a study published five years previously (Kunz et al., 2000) that may not be optimal for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. First, a 1.5-T pelvic phased-array coil with a 256 × 512 matrix offers better spatial resolution than a 1-T body coil with a matrix of 154 × 256, particularly for the detection of hyperintense myometrial spots, which are the findings most specific to adenomyosis. Second, the usefulness of fat-saturated turbo-spin echo sequences for the detection of adenomyosis has never been demonstrated. Third, breath-hold T2-weighted sequences (true fast imaging with steady-state precession and turbo-inversion-recovery sequences) offer better differentiation between focal adenomyosis and uterine contraction, optimize the accuracy of MR imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis and reduce interobserver variability, while fast spin-echo T2-weighted images and breath-hold T2-weighted sequences appear to have similar accuracy (Bazot et al., 2003). Concerning the MR imaging criteria, Kunz et al. considered that a junctional zone maximum of >11 mm (JZmax) was alone sufficient for the diagnosis of adenomyosis (Reinhold et al., 1996). In our experience, however, isolated JZmax >11 mm has a sensitivity and specificity of, respectively, 62% and 96% for the diagnosis of adenomyosis (Bazot et al., 2001). The combination of JZ thickness with high-signal-intensity myometrial spots, JZmax/entire myometrium >40% and regular homogeneous uterine enlargement increases the accuracy of MR imaging in women with adenomyosis who do not have associated leiomyomas, raising the sensitivity and specificity to 87% and 100%, respectively (Bazot et al., 2001). Regarding clinical implications, using a JZmax threshold of 10 mm as a criterion of adenomyosis, Kunz et al. found a very high prevalence of adenomyosis in the ‘total endometriotic’ group (79%) compared to both ‘healthy controls’ (9%) and ‘total controls’ (28%) (Kunz et al., 2005). These results contrast with those of a recent study in which only 44 (27%) of 163 women with pelvic endometriosis proven by laparoscopy and histology had adenomyosis on pre-operative MR imaging (Bazot et al., 2004). Finally, like Kunz et al. we also found that uterine adenomyosis was the main determinant of infertility in a series of 34 women undergoing laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis, 22 of whom wished to conceive (Darai et al., 2005). 1Departments of Radiology and 2Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dei448

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Bazot, M., Fiori, O., & Darai, E.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
1101-1102
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2159808997
Cited by
282
References
15
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adenomyosis in endometriosis – prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/dei448
The paper
Bazot, M., Fiori, O., & Darai, E. (2006). Adenomyosis in endometriosis – prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei448

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.