The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adenomyosis in endometriosis – prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging
Open accessAbstract
Sir, We read with great interest the paper by Kunz et al. entitled ‘Adenomyosis in endometriosis – prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging’ (Kunz et al., 2005). The authors found a higher incidence of uterine adenomyosis in women with endometriosis than in women without endometriosis and suggested that adenomyosis could be a determinant of infertility (Kunz et al., 2005). However, this article raises issues concerning the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol used to diagnose adenomyosis. Concerning the imaging technique itself, the authors directly adopted a protocol used in a study published five years previously (Kunz et al., 2000) that may not be optimal for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. First, a 1.5-T pelvic phased-array coil with a 256 × 512 matrix offers better spatial resolution than a 1-T body coil with a matrix of 154 × 256, particularly for the detection of hyperintense myometrial spots, which are the findings most specific to adenomyosis. Second, the usefulness of fat-saturated turbo-spin echo sequences for the detection of adenomyosis has never been demonstrated. Third, breath-hold T2-weighted sequences (true fast imaging with steady-state precession and turbo-inversion-recovery sequences) offer better differentiation between focal adenomyosis and uterine contraction, optimize the accuracy of MR imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis and reduce interobserver variability, while fast spin-echo T2-weighted images and breath-hold T2-weighted sequences appear to have similar accuracy (Bazot et al., 2003). Concerning the MR imaging criteria, Kunz et al. considered that a junctional zone maximum of >11 mm (JZmax) was alone sufficient for the diagnosis of adenomyosis (Reinhold et al., 1996). In our experience, however, isolated JZmax >11 mm has a sensitivity and specificity of, respectively, 62% and 96% for the diagnosis of adenomyosis (Bazot et al., 2001). The combination of JZ thickness with high-signal-intensity myometrial spots, JZmax/entire myometrium >40% and regular homogeneous uterine enlargement increases the accuracy of MR imaging in women with adenomyosis who do not have associated leiomyomas, raising the sensitivity and specificity to 87% and 100%, respectively (Bazot et al., 2001). Regarding clinical implications, using a JZmax threshold of 10 mm as a criterion of adenomyosis, Kunz et al. found a very high prevalence of adenomyosis in the ‘total endometriotic’ group (79%) compared to both ‘healthy controls’ (9%) and ‘total controls’ (28%) (Kunz et al., 2005). These results contrast with those of a recent study in which only 44 (27%) of 163 women with pelvic endometriosis proven by laparoscopy and histology had adenomyosis on pre-operative MR imaging (Bazot et al., 2004). Finally, like Kunz et al. we also found that uterine adenomyosis was the main determinant of infertility in a series of 34 women undergoing laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis, 22 of whom wished to conceive (Darai et al., 2005). 1Departments of Radiology and 2Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sampson, J. A. (1927) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(15)30003-x · Cited by 2,334
Laparoscopic Surgery in Infertile Women with Minimal or Mild Endometriosis
Marcoux, S., Maheux, R., & Bérubé, S. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199707243370401 · Cited by 948
Kunz, G., Beil, D., Deininger, H., Wildt, L., & Leyendecker, G. (1996) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/11.3.627 · Cited by 408
Simón, C., Gutiérrez, A., Vidal, A., de los Santos, M. J., Tarín, J. J., Remohí, J., & Pellicer, A. (1994) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138578 · Cited by 374
Leyendecker, G., Kunz, G., Wildt, L., Beil, D., & Deininger, H. (1996) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019435 · Cited by 307
Uterine junctional zone, function and disease
Brosens, J. J., de Souza, N. M., & Barker, F. G. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91387-4 · Cited by 215 · cited 2×
“That is why uterine adenomyosis presents in MRI as a hypointense diffuse or focal broadening of the junctional zone ( Brosens et al., 1995; Reinhold et al., 1998; Kunz et al., 2000a).”
BackgroundEndometriosis: A dysfunction and disease of the archimetra
Leyendecker, G. (1998) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/4.5.752 · Cited by 199
Uterine peristaltic activity and the development of endometriosis
LEYENDECKER, G., KUNZ, G., HERBERTZ, M., BEIL, D., HUPPERT, P., MALL, G., KISSLER, S., NOE, M., & WILDT, L. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1335.036 · Cited by 162 · cited 1×
“This is not surprising in view of our understanding of the disease process ( Leyendecker et al., 2004 ).”
BackgroundWildt, L. (1998) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/4.5.655 · Cited by 149
Characteristics of uterine contractility during menses in women with mild to moderate endometriosis
Bulletti, C., De Ziegler, D., Polli, V., Del Ferro, E., Palini, S., & Flamigni, C. (2002) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03087-x · Cited by 147
Cited by
Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis
Chapron, C., Marcellin, L., Borghese, B., & Santulli, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-019-0245-z · Cited by 1,084
Benagiano, G., & Brosens, I. (2006) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.007 · Cited by 531
The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis, tissue injury and repair
Leyendecker, G., Wildt, L., & Mall, G. (2009) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1191-0 · Cited by 418
Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis, invagination or metaplasia?
García-Solares, J., Donnez, J., Donnez, O., & Dolmans, M.-M. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.030 · Cited by 339
Leone Roberti Maggiore, U., Ferrero, S., Mangili, G., Bergamini, A., Inversetti, A., Giorgione, V., Viganò, P., & Candiani, M. (2016) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv045 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Bazot, M., Fiori, O., & Darai, E.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1101-1102
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2159808997
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adenomyosis in endometriosis – prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/dei448
- The paper
- Bazot, M., Fiori, O., & Darai, E. (2006). Adenomyosis in endometriosis – prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.