Cited by 375Endometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and Technologies

Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in-vitro fertilization and oocyte donation

Simón, C., Gutiérrez, A., Vidal, A., de los Santos, M.J., Tarín, J.J., Remohí, J., Pellicer, A.·1994·Human Reproduction

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of our in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and oocyte donation programmes was carried out in order to gain clinical knowledge of the factors involved in the aetiology of the endometriosis-associated infertility. Comparison between the IVF outcomes from 96 cycles in 78 patients with tubal infertility and from 96 cycles in 59 women with endometriosis indicates that endometriosis patients have a poor IVF outcome in terms of reduced pregnancy rate per cycle (P < 0.0004), reduced pregnancy rate per transfer (P < 0.002), and reduced implantation rate (P < 0.003). The analysis of patients undergoing oocyte donation for different reasons, including low response with or without endometriosis, showed that patients with this disease have the same chances of implantation and pregnancy as other recipients when the oocytes came from donors without known endometriosis. However, when the results of oocyte donation were classified according to the origin of the oocytes donated, patients who received embryos derived from endometriotic ovaries showed a significantly (P < 0.05) reduced implantation rate as compared to the remaining groups. Taken together, all these observations suggest that infertility in endometriosis patients may be related to alterations within the oocyte, which in turn result in embryos with decreased ability to implant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138578

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simón, C., Gutiérrez, A., Vidal, A., de los Santos, M. J., Tarín, J. J., Remohí, J., & Pellicer, A.
Affiliations
Universitat de València (ES)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1994-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
725-729
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2151618269
Cited by
374
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
endometriosis, endometriosis-associated infertility, IVF outcomes, oocyte donation, tubal infertility, implantation rate, oocyte quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Embryo Transfer, Endometriosis, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Female, Oocytes, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Tissue Donors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review