Cited by 334Ovarian function and disordersEndometriosis Research and TreatmentGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a normal population according to the Rotterdam criteria versus revised criteria including anti-Mullerian hormone

Lauritsen, M. P., Bentzen, J. G., Pinborg, A., Loft, A., Forman, J. L., Thuesen, L. L., Cohen, A., Hougaard, D. M. +1 more·2014·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Study question What is the prevalence in a normal population of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) according to the Rotterdam criteria versus revised criteria including anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)? Summary answer The prevalence of PCOS was 16.6% according to the Rotterdam criteria. When replacing the criterion for polycystic ovaries by antral follicle count (AFC) > 19 or AMH > 35 pmol/l, the prevalence of PCOS was 6.3 and 8.5%, respectively. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: The Rotterdam criteria state that two out of the following three criteria should be present in the diagnosis of PCOS: oligo-anovulation, clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries (AFC ≥ 12 and/or ovarian volume >10 ml). However, with the advances in sonography, the relevance of the AFC threshold in the definition of polycystic ovaries has been challenged, and AMH has been proposed as a marker of polycystic ovaries in PCOS. Study design, size, duration From 2008 to 2010, a prospective, cross-sectional study was performed including 863 women aged 20-40 years and employed at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Participants/material, setting, methods We studied a subgroup of 447 women with a mean (±SD) age of 33.5 (±4.0) years who were all non-users of hormonal contraception. Data on menstrual cycle disorder and the presence of hirsutism were obtained. On cycle Days 2-5, or on a random day in the case of oligo- or amenorrhoea, sonographic and endocrine parameters were measu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/det469

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lauritsen, M. P., Bentzen, J. G., Pinborg, A., Loft, A., Forman, J. L., Thuesen, L. L., Cohen, A., Hougaard, D. M., & Nyboe Andersen, A.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
Corresponding author
Lauritsen, M. P.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2014-01-16
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
791-801
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2102272748
Cited by
334
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12
FWCI
31.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, prevalence, Rotterdam criteria, anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicle count, polycystic ovary, age-related prevalence, menstrual disorders, hirsutism, hyperandrogenism, oligoanovulation, ovarian volume, women of reproductive age, Denmark
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Female, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Ultrasonography, Prevalence, Area Under Curve, Anti-Mullerian Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review