Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 671

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research

Open access
Verhaak, C.M., Smeenk, J.M.J., Evers, A.W.M., Kremer, J.A.M., Kraaimaat, F.W., Braat, D.D.M.·2007·Human Reproduction Update

Abstract

This review provides an overview of how women adjust emotionally to the various phases of IVF treatment in terms of anxiety, depression or general distress before, during and after different treatment cycles. A systematic scrutiny of the literature yielded 706 articles that paid attention to emotional aspects of IVF treatment of which 27 investigated the women's emotional adjustment with standardized measures in relation to norm or control groups. Most studies involved concurrent comparisons between women in different treatment phases and different types of control groups. The findings indicated that women starting IVF were only slightly different emotionally from the norm groups. Unsuccessful treatment raised the women's levels of negative emotions, which continued after consecutive unsuccessful cycles. In general, most women proved to adjust well to unsuccessful IVF, although a considerable group showed subclinical emotional problems. When IVF resulted in pregnancy, the negative emotions disappeared, indicating that treatment-induced stress is considerably related to threats of failure. The concurrent research reviewed, should now be underpinned by longitudinal studies to provide more information about women's long-term emotional adjustment to unsuccessful IVF and about indicators of risk factors for problematic emotional adjustment after unsuccessful treatment, to foster focused psychological support for women at risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humupd/dml040

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Abramson, 1978, J Abnorm Psychol, 87, 49, 10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49 · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.87.1.49 · Paper page
  2. Alloy, 1999, Behav Res Ther, 37, 503, 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00157-0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ardenti, 1999, Hum Reprod, 14, 3126, 10.1093/humrep/14.12.3126 · DOI
  4. Beaurepaire, 1994, J Psychosom Res, 38, 229, 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90118-X · DOI
  5. Berg, 1991, J Behav Med, 14, 11, 10.1007/BF00844765 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bergner, 1981, Med Care, 19, 787, 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Boivin, 1995, Fertil Steril, 64, 802, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57858-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Boivin, 1995, Fertil Steril, 63, 801, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57485-8 · DOI
  9. Boivin, 2001, Hum Reprod, 16, 1301, 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1301 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Callan, 1988, J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf, 5, 290, 10.1007/BF01132180 · DOI
  11. Daniluk, 2001, J Couns Dev, 79, 439, 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01991.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dennerstein, 1988, J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 9, 159, 10.3109/01674828809016798 · DOI
  13. Derogatis, 1973, Psychopharmacol Bull, 9, 13
  14. Domar, 1993, J Psychosom Obstet Gyn, 14, 45
  15. Edelmann, 1990, J Reprod Infertil Psychol, 8, 161, 10.1080/02646839008403621 · DOI
  16. Edelmann, 1994, J Psychosom Res, 38, 355, 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90040-X · DOI
  17. Evers, 2001, J Consult Clin Psychol, 69, 1026, 10.1037/0022-006X.69.6.1026 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fekkes, 2003, Hum Reprod, 18, 1536, 10.1093/humrep/deg276 · DOI
  19. Folkman, 1984, J Pers Soc Psychol, 46, 839, 10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Freeman, 1987, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 66, 517, 10.3109/00016348709015727 · DOI
  21. Greenfeld, 1984, Soc Work Health Care, 10, 71, 10.1300/J010v10n02_06 · doi:10.1300/j010v10n02_06
  22. Hammarberg, 2001, Hum Reprod, 16, 374, 10.1093/humrep/16.2.374 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hearn, 1987, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 156, 269, 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90266-3 · DOI
  24. Hjelmstedt, 2004, Fertil Steril, 81, 1254, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.061 · DOI
  25. Holahan, 1985, J Pers Soc Psychol, 49, 739, 10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.739 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.739 · Paper page
  26. Hynes, 1992, Br J Med Psychol, 65, 269, 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1992.tb01707.x · DOI
  27. Kemeter, 1988, Hum Reprod, 3, 341, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136706 · DOI
  28. Kentenich, 1989, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 245, 1052, 10.1007/BF02417681 · doi:10.1007/bf02417681
  29. Klock, 2000, Fertil Steril, 73, 1159, 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00530-6 · DOI
  30. Kolonoff-Cohen, 2001, Fertil Steril, 76, 675, 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02008-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Leiblum, 1998, Hum Reprod, 13, 3569, 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3569 · DOI
  32. Leventhal, 1984, Vol. 4, 219
  33. Lok, 2002, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 53, 195, 10.1159/000064560 · DOI
  34. Lubin, 1981, J Clin Psychol, 37, 809, 10.1002/1097-4679(198110)37:4<809::AID-JCLP2270370420>3.0.CO;2-8 · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198110)37:4<809::aid-jclp2270370420>3.0.co;2-8
  35. Lukse, 1999, Obstet Gynecol, 93, 245
  36. Mahlstedt, 1985, Fertil Steril, 43, 335, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48428-1 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Mazure, 1989, J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf, 6, 242, 10.1007/BF01132873 · DOI
  38. Menning, 1980, Fertil Steril, 34, 313, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)45031-4 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Merari, 1992, J Assist Reprod Genet, 9, 161, 10.1007/BF01203757 · DOI
  40. Mori, 1997, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 44, 157, 10.1159/000291510 · DOI
  41. Newton, 1990, Fertil Steril, 54, 879, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53950-8 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Ormel, 1991, J Pers Soc Psychol, 60, 744, 10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.744 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Osowiecki, 1999, Cogn Ther Res, 23, 169, 10.1023/A:1018779228432 · DOI
  44. Pakenham, 1999, Health Psychol, 18, 383, 10.1037/0278-6133.18.4.383 · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.18.4.383 · Paper page
  45. Rothbaum, 1982, J Pers Soc Psychol, 42, 5, 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5 · Paper page
  46. Salvatore, 2001, Fertil Steril, 75, 1119, 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01775-7 · DOI
  47. Schmidt, 2005, Hum Reprod, 20, 3248, 10.1093/humrep/dei193 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Slade, 1997, Hum Reprod, 12, 183, 10.1093/humrep/12.1.183 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Smeenk, 2004, Fertil Steril, 81, 262, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.027 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Stanton, 1992, J Soc Clin Psychol, 11, 1, 10.1521/jscp.1992.11.1.1 · DOI
  51. Sydsjo, 2002, Hum Reprod, 17, 3242, 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3242 · DOI
  52. Taylor, 1983, Am Psychol, 38, 1161, 10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1161 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Terry, 1998, J Pers Soc Psychol, 74, 1078, 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.1078 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.1078 · Paper page
  54. Van Balen, 1993, J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 14, 53
  55. Verhaak, 2001, Fertil Steril, 76, 525, 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01931-8 · DOI
  56. Verhaak, 2005, J Behav Med, 28, 181, 10.1007/s10865-005-3667-0 · DOI
  57. Verhaak, 2005, Hum Reprod, 20, 2253, 10.1093/humrep/dei015 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Visser, 1994, J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 15, 35, 10.3109/01674829409025627 · DOI
  59. Weaver, 1997, Patient Educ Couns, 31, 7, 10.1016/S0738-3991(97)01005-7 · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(97)01005-7
  60. Wright, 1989, Int J Fertil, 34, 126
  61. Yong, 2000, J Assist Reprod Genet, 17, 553, 10.1023/A:1026429712794 · DOI

Cited by

See all 671

Metadata

Authors
Verhaak, C. M., Smeenk, J. M. J., Evers, A. W. M., Kremer, J. A. M., Kraaimaat, F. W., & Braat, D. D. M.
Venue
Human Reproduction Update
Published
2006-08-29
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
27-36
ISSN
  • 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2369
OpenAlex
W2109129651
Cited by
671
References
12
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dml040
The paper
Verhaak, C. M., Smeenk, J. M. J., Evers, A. W. M., Kremer, J. A. M., Kraaimaat, F. W., & Braat, D. D. M. (2007). Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.