The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND; Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) reduce levels of androgen, especially testosterone (T), by inhibiting ovarian and adrenal androgen synthesis and by increasing levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Although this suppressive effect has been investigated by numerous studies over many years, to our knowledge no systematic review concerning this issue had been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of COCs on concentrations of total T, free T and SHBG in healthy women and to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T and free T. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed using database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials) and all publications (from inception date until July 2012) investigating the effect of COCs on androgen levels in healthy women were considered eligible for selection. Three reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction and critical appraisal. For the meta-analysis, data on total T, free T and SHBG were extracted and combined using random effects analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T or free T. RESULTS: A total of 151 records were identified by systematic review and 42 studies with a total of 1495 healthy young women (age range: 18-40 years) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were experimental studies and 21 were non-comparative. Pooling of the results derived from all the included papers showed that total T levels significantly decreased during COC use [mean difference (MD) (95% confidence interval, CI) -0.49 nmol/l (-0.55, -0.42); P < 0.001]. Significantly lower levels of free T were also found [relative change (95% CI) 0.39 (0.35, 0.43); P < 0.001], with a mean decrease of 61%. On the contrary, SHBG concentrations significantly increased during all types of COC use [MD (95% CI) 99.08 nmol/l (86.43, 111.73); P < 0.001]. Subgroup analyses revealed that COCs containing 20-25 µg EE had similar effects on total and free T compared with COCs with 30-35 µg EE. In addition, suppressive effects on T levels were not different when comparing different types of progestins. However, subgroup analyses for the estrogen dose and the progestin type in relation to changes in SHBG levels did show significant differences: COCs containing second generation progestins and/or the lower estrogen doses (20-25 µg EE) were found to have less impact on SHBG concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature review and meta-analysis demonstrates that COCs decrease circulating levels of total T and free T and increase SBHG concentrations. Due to the SHBG increase, free T levels decrease twice as much as total T. The estrogen dose and progestin type of the COC do not influence the decline of total and free T, but both affect SHBG. The clinical implications of suppressed androgen levels during COC use remain to be elucidated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700 · Cited by 17,648
A Critical Evaluation of Simple Methods for the Estimation of Free Testosterone in Serum
Vermeulen, A., Verdonck, L., & Kaufman, J. M. (1999) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.84.10.6079 · Cited by 3,824
Sex Steroids and the Construction and Conservation of the Adult Skeleton
Riggs, B. L., Khosla, S., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.23.3.0465 · Cited by 1,846
Rosner, W., Auchus, R. J., Azziz, R., Sluss, P. M., & Raff, H. (2007) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1864 · Cited by 1,176 · cited 3×
“The accuracy of RIA can be improved by the addition of an extraction step or chromatography (Rosner et al., 2007; Groenestege et al., 2012), but these procedures are time consuming.”
BackgroundMethodBurger, H. G. (2002) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)02985-0 · Cited by 771 · cited 5×
“Advanced Access publication on September 29, 2013 doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt038 results: A total of 151 records were identified by systematic review and 42 studies with a total of 1495 healthy young women (age range: 18– 40 years) were included in the meta-analysis.”
BackgroundInfluentialAndrogen therapy in women: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline
Wierman, M. E., Basson, R., Davis, S. R., Khosla, S., Miller, K. K., Rosner, W., & Santoro, N. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1121 · Cited by 301 · cited 2×
“In particular, immunoassays are affected by cross-reactivity with other steroids (Middle, 2007; Benton et al., 2011) and by high levels of SHBG (Masters and Hahnel, 1989; Wierman et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMiller, K. K., Rosner, W., Lee, H., Hier, J., Sesmilo, G., Schoenfeld, D., Neubauer, G., & Klibanski, A. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030680 · Cited by 301
Toward Excellence in Testosterone Testing: A Consensus Statement
Rosner, W., & Vesper, H. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1314 · Cited by 248
Cited by
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Etiology, Current Management, and Future Therapeutics
Singh, S., Pal, N., Shubham, S., Sarma, D. K., Verma, V., Marotta, F., & Kumar, M. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12041454 · Cited by 521
Management of Acne Vulgaris: A Review
Eichenfield, D. Z., Sprague, J., & Eichenfield, L. F. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.17633 · Cited by 389
Martin, K. A., Anderson, R. R., Chang, R. J., Ehrmann, D. A., Lobo, R. A., Murad, M. H., Pugeat, M. M., & Rosenfield, R. L. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2018-00241 · Cited by 339
Liu, J. J. W., Ein, N., Peck, K., Huang, V., Pruessner, J. C., & Vickers, K. (2017) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.04.007 · Cited by 274
Clayton, A. H., Goldstein, I., Kim, N. N., Althof, S. E., Faubion, S. S., Faught, B. M., Parish, S. J., Simon, J. A., Vignozzi, L., Christiansen, K., et al. (2018) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.11.002 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmerman, Y., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Coelingh Bennink, H. J. T., Blankenstein, M. A., & Fauser, B. C. J. M.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-09-29
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-105
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2137347877
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dmt038
- The paper
- Zimmerman, Y., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Coelingh Bennink, H. J. T., Blankenstein, M. A., & Fauser, B. C. J. M. (2014). The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.