Cited by 207Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Case-Control Designs in the Study of Common Diseases: Updates on the Demise of the Rare Disease Assumption and the Choice of Sampling Scheme for Controls

RODRIGUES, LAURA, KIRKWOOD, BETTY R·1990·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Rodrigues L (Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK) and Kirkwood BR. Case-control designs in the study of common diseases: updates on the demise of the rare disease assumption and the choice of sampling scheme for controls. International Journal of Epidemiology 1990, 19: 205–213. In recent years the use of case-control designs has been extended to the study of common diseases. It has been shown that the rare disease assumption is not necessary, and that by a suitable choice of sampling scheme for controls, it is possible to obtain direct estimates of relative risk and relative rate, instead of relying on the odds ratio as an indirect estimate. The majority of papers addressing these issues are theoretical, and the arguments have been couched in mathematical terms. As such they are not readily accessible to many practising epidemiologists. This paper summarizes the discussion in a simplified manner. It describes the three different measures of relative incidence, namely the relative risk, the relative rate and the odds ratio, together with their corresponding case-control designs. The discussion is extended to show that the choice of the appropriate measure of relative incidence depends on the mode of action of the risk factor, as well as on characteristics of disease. We propose a classification scheme comprising five different categories of situation, and make recommendations regarding study designs for each.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/19.1.205

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depending on sampling strategy for cases and controls and nature of population studied, the odds ratio obtained in a case-control study is interpreted as the risk ratio, rate ratio or (prevalence) odds ratio.

    “Depending on the sampling strategy for cases and controls and the nature of the population studied, the odds ratio obtained in a case-control study is interpreted as the risk ratio, rate ratio or (prevalence) odds ratio [ 16 , 17 ].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RODRIGUES, L., & KIRKWOOD, B. R.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1990
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
205-213
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2162529136
Cited by
207
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
case-control study, relative risk, relative rates, odds ratio, common diseases, study design recommendations
MeSH terms
Humans, Risk, Cohort Studies, Causality, Incidence, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review