Cited by 130Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Psychotropic drugs and the risk of fall injuries, hospitalisations and mortality among older adults

Open access
Johnell, Kristina, Jonasdottir Bergman, Gudrun, Fastbom, Johan, Danielsson, Bengt, Borg, Natalia, Salmi, Peter·2017·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether psychotropics are associated with an increased risk of fall injuries, hospitalizations, and mortality in a large general population of older adults. Methods We performed a nationwide matched (age, sex, and case event day) case–control study between 1 January and 31 December 2011 based on several Swedish registers (n = 1,288,875 persons aged ≥65 years). We used multivariate conditional logistic regression adjusted for education, number of inpatient days, Charlson co‐morbidity index, dementia and number of other drugs. Results Antidepressants were the psychotropic most strongly related to fall injuries (ORadjusted: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.38–1.45) and antipsychotics to hospitalizations (ORadjusted: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.19–1.24) and death (ORadjusted: 2.10; 95% CI: 2.02–2.17). Number of psychotropics was associated with increased the risk of fall injuries, (4 psychotropics vs 0: ORadjusted: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.39–1.68), hospitalization (4 psychotropics vs 0: ORadjusted: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.22–1.33) and death (4 psychotropics vs 0: ORadjusted: 2.50; 95% CI: 2.33–2.69) in a dose–response manner. Among persons with dementia (n = 58,984), a dose–response relationship was found between number of psychotropics and mortality risk (4 psychotropics vs 0: ORadjusted: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.76–2.25). Conclusions Our findings support a cautious prescribing of multiple psychotropic drugs to older patients. © 2016 The Authors. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.4483

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In older adults, psychotropic use has been associated with risk of severe adverse effects such as falls, stroke and mortality.

    “In older adults, psychotropic use has been associated with the risk of severe adverse effects such as falls [13–18], stroke [17, 19–22] and mortality [13, 23–25].”

    From Stakeholders' views on the use of psychotropic medication in older people: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion’s Main findings report an association between psychotropic drug use and fall injuries and mortality among older adults. The paper does not report an association with stroke, so it supports only part of the attributed claim. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnell, K., Jonasdottir Bergman, G., Fastbom, J., Danielsson, B., Borg, N., & Salmi, P.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) Stockholm Sweden
  • National Board of Health and Welfare (SE)
Corresponding author
Johnell, Kristina
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-25
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
414-420
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2343691934
Cited by
130
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
psychotropic drugs, fall-related injuries, hospitalization, mortality, older adults, antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, polypharmacy, dementia, dose-response relationship, drug prescribing
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Mental Disorders, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Mortality, Psychotropic Drugs, Sweden, Antipsychotic Agents, Comorbidity, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review