Cited by 594Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Head Trauma as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer's Disease: A Collaborative Re-Analysis of Case-Control Studies

Open access
Mortimer, J A, Van Duijn, C M, Chandra, V, Fratiglioni, L, Graves, A B, Heyman, A, Jorm, A F, Kokmen, E, Kondo, K, Rocca, W A, Shalat, S L, Soininen, H, A Hofman for the Eurodem Risk Factors Research Group·1991·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

A re-analysis of the data from 11 case-control studies was performed to investigate the association between head trauma and Alzheimer's disease (AD). To increase comparability of studies, exposures were limited to head trauma with loss of consciousness (hereafter referred to as 'head trauma') and comparisons were restricted to community (versus hospital) controls. Test for heterogeneity across studies was negative; consequently, data were pooled in subsequent analyses. The pooled relative risk for head trauma was 1.82 (95% confidence interval: 1.26-2.67). Stratified analyses showed stronger associations in cases without a positive family history of dementia and in males (versus females). Adjustment of the pooled relative risk for family history of dementia, education and alcohol consumption did not alter significantly the association between head trauma and AD. There was no interaction effect between head trauma and family history of dementia, suggesting that these risk factors operate independently. Mean age of onset was not significantly different in cases with a history of head trauma compared to cases without such a history. The findings of the pooled analysis support an association between reported head trauma and AD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/20.supplement_2.s28

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 592

Metadata

Authors
Mortimer, J. A., Van Duijn, C. M., Chandra, V, Fratiglioni, L., Graves, A. B., Heyman, A., Jorm, A. F., Kokmen, E., Kondo, K., Rocca, W. A., Shalat, S. L., Soininen, H., & A Hofman for the Eurodem Risk Factors Research Group
Affiliations
  • Minneapolis VA Medical Center (US)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Mortimer, J A
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1991-01-01
Volume
20
Issue
Supplement 2
Pages
S28-S35
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2142046013
Cited by
594
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
head trauma, Alzheimer's disease, risk factors, loss of consciousness, family history of dementia, sex differences, age of onset, pooled relative risk, case-control study
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Australia, Europe, Female, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Male, Risk, Risk Factors, United States, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review